2008 American Control Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2008.4587003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified framework for detection, isolation and compensation of actuator faults in uncertain particulate processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I I (10) For the above-described augmented system eq 9, the corresponding FTC can be designed to yield tracking performance under both normal and admissible faults.…”
Section: Traditional Fault-tolerant Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I I (10) For the above-described augmented system eq 9, the corresponding FTC can be designed to yield tracking performance under both normal and admissible faults.…”
Section: Traditional Fault-tolerant Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wang et al [4] put forward an iterative learning control (ILC) scheme for batch processes under partial actuator faults according to a particular 2D Fornasini-Marchsini model. Giridhar and El-Farra [5] proposed a robust detection, isolation, and compensation of control actuator faults based on the framework of feedback robust control. Jin et al [6] proposed an improved ILC scheme to control the nonlinear constrained system with actuator failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of model‐predictive control (MPC) has been proposed to improve process safety . Other methods used for safety analysis or improved safety include: (a) sneak analysis to identify hazards by detecting paths through which unwanted material or energy is transferred between the process components, (b) hierarchical task analysis, which is a systematic qualitative technique of analyzing hazards associated with human errors, (c) hazardous human‐error analysis to identify hazards arising from human‐machinery interactions, (d) failure mode and effects analysis to identify hazards and predict their consequences, (e) alarm standards design, (f) Bayesian networks, (g) detection, isolation, and compensation of actuator faults, (h) shortcut risk assessment, and (i) human reliability analysis . Also, several analytical tools have been developed and used for operability analysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%