2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified failure criterion for unstabilized rammed earth materials upon varying relative humidity conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results (available in details in [14]) exhibit the following trends: -The UCS increases with suction: dryer is the soil and higher is the strength. -However, in the same time, the brittleness also increases with suction: the material is less and less ductile when the amount of water in the soil decreases.…”
Section: Uniaxial Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The results (available in details in [14]) exhibit the following trends: -The UCS increases with suction: dryer is the soil and higher is the strength. -However, in the same time, the brittleness also increases with suction: the material is less and less ductile when the amount of water in the soil decreases.…”
Section: Uniaxial Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The effect of suction was included assuming a linear increase in tensile strength similar to the Barcelona Basic Model. More recently Gerard et al [12] presented results from tests on an unsaturated Belgian clayey silt with similar properties to a typical RE mix (without a gravel fraction), results of which were then used to validate a constitutive model based on a generalized effective stress (Bishop stress) approach with values suggested for the effective stress parameter . The attempt to fit an EC material into one of the two established methods for dealing with effective stress in unsaturated soils is an interesting development, also seen in [13].…”
Section: Constitutive Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows that strength almost doubled between the high and low suction conditions for both soils. It is unlikely that a practitioner would have the time or the facilities to derive full water retention curves for a given soil, for example Figure 10, or determine a full yield surface for their material, for example as in [12]. However, a change in strength of the magnitude shown in Figure 9 would be critical to a project's feasibility.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grainsize distribution is: 13 % of clay, 64 % of silt and 26 % of sand. The permeability of the saturated silt compacted first at the Optimum Proctor compaction conditions (initial water content w 0 = 14.8%; initial dry density ρ d0 = 18.40 kN/m³ -see [9] for more details) and then resaturated is equal to 10 -10 m/s. The determination of the retention curve of the silt is based on the use of 2 techniques: the pressure plate apparatus [10] and the vapour transfer technique [11].…”
Section: Materials and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%