2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00493-017-3683-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unified Erdős–Pósa Theorem for Constrained Cycles

Abstract: A (Γ1, Γ2)-labeled graph is an oriented graph with its edges labeled by elements of the direct sum of two groups Γ1, Γ2. A cycle in such a labeled graph is (Γ1, Γ2)-non-zero if it is non-zero in both coordinates. Our main result is a generalization of the Flat Wall Theorem of Robertson and Seymour to (Γ1, Γ2)-labeled graphs. As an application, we determine all canonical obstructions to the Erdős-Pósa property for (Γ1, Γ2)-non-zero cycles in (Γ1, Γ2)-labeled graphs. The obstructions imply that the halfintegral … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Huynh et al. proved an Erdős‐Pósa type result for cycles in graphs with group labels that includes many previously known results, such as ours, as well as several new ones, such as an Erdős‐Pósa type result for (long) S 1 ‐ S 2 ‐cycles. That much greater generality, however, requires deep tools from minor theory that, in turn, lead to a much worse size of the hitting set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Recently, Huynh et al. proved an Erdős‐Pósa type result for cycles in graphs with group labels that includes many previously known results, such as ours, as well as several new ones, such as an Erdős‐Pósa type result for (long) S 1 ‐ S 2 ‐cycles. That much greater generality, however, requires deep tools from minor theory that, in turn, lead to a much worse size of the hitting set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For S = V (G), these results yield the Erdős-Pósa property for cycles and cycles of length at least , respectively. Several other results about S-cycles are proved in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If H is a class of graphs, G is a graph and S ⊆ A x (G), then a S-H-subgraph of G is a subgraph of G isomorphic to some member of H and that contain one edge/vertex of S. We are now interested in comparing, for every graph G and every S ⊆ A x (G), the maximum number of S-H-subgraph of G with the minimum number of elements of A x (G) that meet all S-H-subgraphs of G. We refer to these problems by prefixing the guest class with an "S" (like in "S-cycles"). The authors of [HJW16] consider (S 1 , S 2 )-cycles for S 1 , S 2 ⊆ V (G): such cycles must meet both of S and S ′ . A generalization of this type of problem has been introduced in [KM15]: instead of one set S, one considers three subsets S 1 , S 2 , S 3 of V (G) and a (S 1 , S 2 , S 3 )-subgraph is required to intersect at least two sets of S 1 , S 2 and S 3 .…”
Section: Patterns With Prescribed Verticesmentioning
confidence: 99%