2010
DOI: 10.1142/s0218202510004222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unified Approach to Mimetic Finite Difference, Hybrid Finite Volume and Mixed Finite Volume Methods

Abstract: We investigate the connections between several recent methods for the discretization of anisotropic heterogeneous diffusion operators on general grids. We prove that the Mimetic Finite Difference scheme, the Hybrid Finite Volume scheme and the Mixed Finite Volume scheme are in fact identical up to some slight generalizations. As a consequence, some of the mathematical results obtained for each of the method (such as convergence properties or error estimates) may be extended to the unified common framework. We … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
208
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
208
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that W D tends to 0 may be proved in a similar way to that of the proof of Lemma 3.1 below. Note that the SUSHI scheme is also part of the mimetic mixed hybrid family [16]; however, in the general form of mimetic schemes, we do not know how to include the stabilisation term (which is needed for the coercivity of the scheme) in the gradient term in order to write the scheme under the form (1.2).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that W D tends to 0 may be proved in a similar way to that of the proof of Lemma 3.1 below. Note that the SUSHI scheme is also part of the mimetic mixed hybrid family [16]; however, in the general form of mimetic schemes, we do not know how to include the stabilisation term (which is needed for the coercivity of the scheme) in the gradient term in order to write the scheme under the form (1.2).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SUSHI method. As a last example we consider two variants of the SUSHI scheme of Eymard, Gallouët, and Herbin [24]; see also Droniou, Eymard, Gallouët, and Herbin [21] for a discussion on the link with the MFD methods of Brezzi, Lipnikov, and coworkers [8,9]. This method is based on the gradient reconstruction (2.12), but stabilization is achieved in a rather 7 different manner with respect to (2.14).…”
Section: Remark 23 (Numerical Integration)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gradient Discretization method (GDM) [5,3] provides a common mathematical framework for a number of numerical schemes dedicated to the approximation of elliptic or parabolic problems, linear or nonlinear, coupled or not; these include conforming and non conforming finite element, mixed finite element, hybrid mixed mimetic schemes [4] and some Multi-Point Flux Approximation [1] and Discrete Duality finite volume schemes [2] : we refer to [3, Part III] for more on this (note that in the present proceedings, it is shown that in some way the Discontinuous Galerkin schemes may also enter this framework [6]). Let us recall this framework in the case of the following linear elliptic problem:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%