A UML Profile for GUI Layout

Blankenhorn, Kai; Jeckle, Mario

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30196-7_9

Cited by 30 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is mainly a consequence of the UML's 'one-size-fits-all' approach as well as the generic and -in current UML CASE tools hardly -customizable graphical representation of its modeling constructs [7]. Especially in the field of HMI development CASE-tools could not become accepted since the UML particularly lacks adequate constructs for Graphical User Interface (GUI) specification [8]. Whereas sophisticated tools like SIMULINK of LABVIEW are available for limited fields of application such as the development of electronic control units (ECUs), however appropriate tool support for HMI developers is still missing.…”

Section: Tool Support For Complex Networked Development Processesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Model-Driven HMI Development: Can Meta-CASE Tools do the Job?

Bock¹

2007

2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today metamodeling and domain-specific languages represent many promising beginnings to create non-generic tool support for project specific modeling tasks. Due to the inherent complexity and numerous variants of human-machine interfaces (HMIs) model-driven development becomes increasingly interesting for manufacturers and suppliers in the automobile industry. Particularly, the development of powerful user interfaces requires appropriate development processes as well as easy-to-use software tools. Since suitable tool kits are missing in the field of HMI development this paper describes the utilization of visual domain-specific languages for model-driven useware engineering in general and model-based specification of automotive HMIs in special. Moreover, results from a survey among developers are presented revealing the requirements for HMI specific tool support. Additionally, experiences with using current meta-CASE tools as well as standard office applications for creating a visual domain-specific language are presented. Based on these experiences requirements for future meta-CASE tools are derived.

show abstract

Section: Tool Support For Complex Networked Development Processesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Model-Driven HMI Development: Can Meta-CASE Tools do the Job?

Bock¹

2007

2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The UML standard notation and its extensions mechanisms, like constraints, tagged values and stereotypes, can style UML profiles for GUI modeling. Some examples are: UML Profile for GUI Layout [16], UMLi [17], Wisdom Profile [18] and VAN4GUIM [19]. The first one is concerned only with the layout and navigational concept of the application while the other three are concerned with behavior and structure of the GUIs.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Test Coverage Analysis of UML Activity Diagrams for Interactive Systems

Faria

Paiva

2010

2010 Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

User interface testing is a very important but time consuming activity. To automate and systematize the testing process, models can be used to derive test cases automatically -a technique known as model-based testing. Given a model representing the intended system behavior and a test suite derived from the model or produced manually, the coverage of the test suite over the model is an important early indicator of the quality and completeness of the test suite. This paper presents a novel tool that shows visually the coverage achieved by a test suite over an UML model of an interactive system. This model is based on activity and class diagrams, with special user interface modeling features (stereotypes and keywords) inspired in ConcurTaskTrees and Canonical Abstract Prototypes. The tool receives a UML model file and a test suite, determines the model coverage by simulating the execution of the test suite over the model, and produces a colored UML model showing the elements covered. An example is presented to illustrate the approach.

show abstract

“…3, the Web2.0MUML profile is represented by a package and can be imported into current Web Engineering, such as UML-based Web Engineering (UWE) [30], Topic Maps [31], GUI Layout modeling [32], WebML [33], etc.…”

Section: A Uml Profile For Web 20 Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual modeling for Web 2.0 applications using model driven architecture approach

Hsu

2013

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A UML Profile for GUI Layout

Cited by 30 publications

References 8 publications

Model-Driven HMI Development: Can Meta-CASE Tools do the Job?

Model-Driven HMI Development: Can Meta-CASE Tools do the Job?

Test Coverage Analysis of UML Activity Diagrams for Interactive Systems

Visual modeling for Web 2.0 applications using model driven architecture approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About