1990
DOI: 10.1501/egifak_0000000797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A.Ü. Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin akademik başarıları

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 29 ] The higher the correlation coefficient is the better the reliability of the items. [ 25 26 ] In this study, the test correlations are at least r = 0.30 for each item on the questionnaire. This shows that the questionnaire items can measure what they are intended to measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 29 ] The higher the correlation coefficient is the better the reliability of the items. [ 25 26 ] In this study, the test correlations are at least r = 0.30 for each item on the questionnaire. This shows that the questionnaire items can measure what they are intended to measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 23 ] Nunually argued that the sample size must be 10 times larger than the number of items in factor analysis,[ 24 ] Gorusch stated that it must be 15 times larger,[ 25 ] and Tavsancil reported that it should be between 5 and 10 times. [ 26 ] Based on these ideas, the authors included 135 patients in the study because the scale has 8 items; thus, the number of items must be at least 15 times larger, and unexpected losses can occur. [ 25 ] Among the participants, 43% ( n = 58) were females and 57% ( n = 77) were males.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained correlation coefficients were accepted as reliability indicators. The high correlation coefficients calculated as a result of the Test-retest method showed that there was a stability between the scores obtained from the two implementations (Tavşancıl, 2005). The calculated correlation coefficients are given in Table 5.…”
Section: Test-retest Reliability Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The data set cannot be factored for KMO ≤0.5 (Field, 2013). KMO value in terms of sample size is as follows: a) Weak between 0,50-0,60 b) Poor between 0,60-0,70 c) Average between 0,70-0,80 d) Average between 0,80-0,90 e) Perfect above 0,90 (Tavşancıl, 2005). The KMO value was calculated as 0.84.…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population of the study consisted of outpatients of the stroke clinic of a university hospital in Izmir, a province in the western part of Turkey. The factor analysis that was conducted to evaluate the factor structure of the sample recommends that the size of a study sample be fivefold to 10-fold the number of the items in the scale (DeVellis, 2003; Şencan, 2005; Tavsancil, 2005). Thus, this study should include a minimum of 130 participants, corresponding to 10 times the total number of scale items (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%