A typology of farm households for the Umutara Province in Rwanda

Abstract

For nearly 30 years, technologies for more sustainable land use have been developed and promoted in Rwanda. However, these technologies have not been fully adopted. Keeping in mind that the farming population is not homogeneous with respect to socioeconomic variables, this paper typifies farm households in Umutara province based on socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of new technology. A multivariate analysis approach that combines Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis allowed us to identify clearly five types of farm households and their socio-economic characteristics. The main differences between the five farm types relate to gender, age, education, risk perception, risk attitude, labour availability, land tenure and income. The five farm types are characterized by respectively having a female head (26% of the farms), being a tenant (7%), having a male and literate head (32%), having an illiterate head with no off-farm activities (18%), and being a large farm with livestock (17%). The respective farm types appeared to have adopted different types of sustainable technologies to a limited extent. Female-headed households adopted the use of compost and green manure. Young male literate farmers were the only ones using chemical fertilizers. Illiterate and full-time farmers applied fallow, manure and erosion control measures to maintain soil fertility. The use of improved livestock is adopted by large farms.

Farm Types and Their Economic Characterization in Complex Agro-Ecosystems for Informed Extension Intervention: Study from Coastal West Bengal, India

“…Crop Diversification Measured by Herfindahl Index; index varies from 0 to 1, '1' -complete specialization and '0' -perfect diversification (Malik and Singh 2002) System Cost of Cultivation Cost of all inputs used (in Indian Rupees), for all enterprises of the farming system including the cost of family labor System Gross Return Total revenue earned (in Indian Rupees) from all the components of the farming system System Net Return System Gross Return -System Cost of Cultivation Cost Benefit Ratio Gross return from sale of output/Total cost of input used to be very similar to each other, and entities belonging to different classes are expected to be dissimilar (Bidogeza et al 2009). …”

Sustainability of Smallholder Agriculture in Semi-Arid Areas under Land Set-aside Programs: A Case Study from China’s Loess Plateau

“…Using SPSS 13.0 [57], we performed a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Barlett's sphericity test to test the appropriateness of the PCA. For easier interpretation of the PCA results, varimax rotation was applied [58]. To obtain composite scores, Equations (2) and (3) are assigned as follows:…”

Plantations de teck, Tectona grandis L.f., en sylviculture paysanne au Sud Bénin

“…Since land is a scarce resource for farmers in southern Benin (MONGBO, 2000), the acreage of teak plantation highlights the importance of tree planting in the farming system. Farm size is usually a key criterion in farmers' typologies (exempli gratia, BIDOGEZA et al, 2009;SOMDA et al, 2005). This variable illustrates the importance of farming activities as a whole.…”