2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A typology of European countries based on innovation efficiency and technology gaps: The role of early-stage entrepreneurship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The breadth of the gap is evident because respondents indicated that they have difficulty accessing a computer and the Internet, and the government does not encourage or speak of the implementation of an electronic government. These results are consistent with what was defined by [20] who affirm that the digital divide is associated with the low level of Internet access, the OECD defines it as "the gap between people, households, companies and geographical areas in the different socioeconomic levels in relation both to their opportunities for access to information and communication technologies (ICT) and to the use of the Internet for a wide variety of activities.…”
Section: Dimension: Digital Gapsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The breadth of the gap is evident because respondents indicated that they have difficulty accessing a computer and the Internet, and the government does not encourage or speak of the implementation of an electronic government. These results are consistent with what was defined by [20] who affirm that the digital divide is associated with the low level of Internet access, the OECD defines it as "the gap between people, households, companies and geographical areas in the different socioeconomic levels in relation both to their opportunities for access to information and communication technologies (ICT) and to the use of the Internet for a wide variety of activities.…”
Section: Dimension: Digital Gapsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In general, the existing research reflects the measurement of technological innovation in three aspects. 1) Measuring technological innovation from the perspective of technological innovation investment, scholars mainly adopt R&D expenditure and government investment in science and technology (Kontolaimou et al, 2016). 2) Measured from the perspective of technological innovation output, the variables include patent (Griliches, 1990), product innovations (Cruz-Cazares et al, 2013), and process innovations (Akgün et al, 2009).…”
Section: Independent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorptive capacity relates to the ability of identifying, assimilating and exploiting knowledge from the external environment (Cohen and Levinthal, 1989). The degree of absorptive capacity depends on human capital and internal R&D, which are crucial for creating new knowledge and promoting learning (Cozza and Zanfei, 2016;Crespi and Zuniga, 2012;Griffith et al, 2004;Hong et al, 2016;Kim, 2015;Kontolaimou et al, 2016;Tang and Zhang, 2016;Wang and Wong, 2012). Successful adoption of foreign technology is therefore contingent on indigenous innovation efforts comprising internal R&D and HCD (Bronzini and Piselli, 2009;Lewandowska, 2015).…”
Section: Absorptive Capacity and Technical Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%