2015
DOI: 10.1080/02650487.2014.995284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
145
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
145
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A typology of resistance strategies shows that consumers can resist not only by avoidance, but also by contesting or empowering (Fransen et al 2015). Contesting includes counterarguing the content and dismissing the source, whereas empowering implies reassuring one's existing attitude (Fransen et al 2015). Future research should investigate whether the three generations differ in their use of resistance strategies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A typology of resistance strategies shows that consumers can resist not only by avoidance, but also by contesting or empowering (Fransen et al 2015). Contesting includes counterarguing the content and dismissing the source, whereas empowering implies reassuring one's existing attitude (Fransen et al 2015). Future research should investigate whether the three generations differ in their use of resistance strategies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation for not finding this outcome is that the newspaper generation might use other ways than avoidance to resist advertising. A typology of resistance strategies shows that consumers can resist not only by avoidance, but also by contesting or empowering (Fransen et al 2015). Contesting includes counterarguing the content and dismissing the source, whereas empowering implies reassuring one's existing attitude (Fransen et al 2015).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these situations, to enhance persuasion, advertisers use a variety of tactics that coercively attracts audience attention to increase the delivery of their advertisement messages [12]. However, recent conditions suggest that the use of these tactics oftentimes lead to contradicting results, negatively shaping the ad performance.…”
Section: Inducing Agents Of Web Ads and Its Subsequent Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding behavioral responses, researchers have examined how users will either watch or divert their attention elsewhere when an advertisement starts playing, distinguishing their behaviors as zapping, zipping, or muting when the advertisement start [15]. Other researchers have taken a similar approach, suggesting that online users prefer not seeing or hearing the ad which leads to behaviors such as leaving the website or skipping the advertising [12].…”
Section: Inducing Agents Of Web Ads and Its Subsequent Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are framing techniques (Gamliel and Herstein, 2012;Krishen et al, 2014;McKechnie et al, 2012), the foot-in-the-door technique (Fennis et al, 2009;Freedman and Fraser, 1966;Pascual et al, 2013), low-balling (Burger et al, 1981;Cialdini et al, 1978), door-in the-face technique (Burger, 1999;Cialdini et al, 1975) and disrupt-then-reframe technique (Davis and Knowles, 1999;Fennis et al, 2004). Approaching consumers in an indirect manner reduces the possibility that consumers show reactance to persuasion (Fransen et al, 2015), which is one of the major disadvantages of direct persuasion techniques (Aronson, 2007). Indirect persuasion enhances the likelihood that a persuasion attempt will succeed (Brehm, 1966;Lunardo and Roux, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%