2023
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Submuscular Breast Reconstructions With Native® Acellular Dermal Matrix

Larissa L Martins,
Rui F Barbosa,
Frederico C Guerreiro
et al.

Abstract: Background: Implant-based submuscular breast reconstruction (SBR) can be performed with the aid of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) for implant coverage on their inferolateral pole, aiming at providing a biological interface for hiding the implant and therefore reducing the risk of complications. The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term post-operative outcomes obtained using the SBR-specific Native® ADM (DECO med s.r.l., Marcon, Venice, Italy). Methods: All cases of Native®-assisted immed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cause of such different results is unclear. Some authors [2,13,[33][34][35][36][37] suggest that most of the studies conducted on the effect of an ADM in the postoperative results were made with AlloDerm ® , which is a product that has been sold for longer, and only more recently, a series has been published with the use of other ADM, both from human and porcine origin, and although the preparation is similar in removing the cellularity of the tissue and infectious organisms, there may be subtle unpublished differences in the processing and storage of these products, causing an inflammatory response with a higher influence in the formation of seroma that could also be related to the increase in other complications such as infections or extrusions of the implant [34]. Reference is also made to important immunological differences between the matrices of human or non-human origin that can influence the rate of complications, preventing extrapolation of results from different studies [14,35,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of such different results is unclear. Some authors [2,13,[33][34][35][36][37] suggest that most of the studies conducted on the effect of an ADM in the postoperative results were made with AlloDerm ® , which is a product that has been sold for longer, and only more recently, a series has been published with the use of other ADM, both from human and porcine origin, and although the preparation is similar in removing the cellularity of the tissue and infectious organisms, there may be subtle unpublished differences in the processing and storage of these products, causing an inflammatory response with a higher influence in the formation of seroma that could also be related to the increase in other complications such as infections or extrusions of the implant [34]. Reference is also made to important immunological differences between the matrices of human or non-human origin that can influence the rate of complications, preventing extrapolation of results from different studies [14,35,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%