2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010663018267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Tiered Cognitive Architecture For Moral Reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to implicit learning approaches, some accounts propose innate and sometimes invariant moral intuition capacities in “nativist” fashion (Bolender, 2003)—such as innate cognitive (or cognitive/affective) responses to stimuli, or innate capacities to master the application of moral concepts (akin to language mastery; cf. Bloom, 2000; Bolender, 2001, 2003). Haidt and various colleagues argue for the presence of moral modules attuned toward particular aspects of social life, with these modules having been developed by evolutionary processes (for a summary of this evolutionary framework, see Haidt, 2012, pt.…”
Section: The Process Of Moral Intuitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to implicit learning approaches, some accounts propose innate and sometimes invariant moral intuition capacities in “nativist” fashion (Bolender, 2003)—such as innate cognitive (or cognitive/affective) responses to stimuli, or innate capacities to master the application of moral concepts (akin to language mastery; cf. Bloom, 2000; Bolender, 2001, 2003). Haidt and various colleagues argue for the presence of moral modules attuned toward particular aspects of social life, with these modules having been developed by evolutionary processes (for a summary of this evolutionary framework, see Haidt, 2012, pt.…”
Section: The Process Of Moral Intuitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mac Intyre noted that on occasion we do have to work-out by logical inference what someone else might be thinking or feeling, but he acknowledged also that we rely on "a primary and more fundamental interpretative knowledge of the thoughts and feelings of others which does not have and does not need inferential justification" (Mac Intyre, 1999a: 14). From a 'modularity of mind' standpoint Bolender (2001) argued that mentally computing the relevant variables would, without the encapsulation of the necessary cognitive and affective functions into intuitive modules, be a potentially enormous computational task involving unrestricted memory search (i.e., imposing an impossible cognitive load on information processing). The moral sense affords the individual an autonomous and quick (i.e., intuitive) knowledge of what is just and fair, but moral knowledge has both conscious analytical-reflective ("conscious mental activity that consists of transforming information about people in order to reach a moral judgment") as well as a non-conscious intuitive-reflexive ("the sudden appearance in consciousness of a moral judgment .…”
Section: The Modularity Of Moralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Norman's kind of dual control model has an application to such diverse areas as attention (Rafal & Henik 1994), reasoning (Epstein 1994;Sloman 1996), attitudes (Wilson et al 2000), moral judgments (Bolender 2001), and emotion (LeDoux 1995), and is revealed in the acquisition of fears and phobias (Jacobs & Nadel 1985) and stress (Toates 1995). This suggests a strong and broad selection pressure to favour dual control.…”
Section: Two Visual Systems Must Still Perceive Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%