A Two-Step FE Model Updating Approach for System and Damage Identification of Prestressed Bridge Girders

Abstract

This study presents a two-step FE model updating approach for health monitoring and damage identification of prestressed concrete girder bridges. To reduce the effects of modeling error in the model updating process, in the first step, modal-based model updating is used to estimate linear model parameters mainly related to the stiffness of boundary conditions and material properties. In the second step, a time-domain model updating is carried out using acceleration data to refine parameters accounting for the nonlinear response behavior of the bridge. In this step, boundary conditions are fixed at their final estimates using modal-based model updating. To prevent the convergence of updating algorithm to local solutions, the initial estimates for nonlinear material properties are selected based on the first-step model updating results. To validate the applicability of the two-step FE model updating approach, a series of forced-vibration experiments are designed and carried out on a pair of full-scale decommissioned and deteriorated prestressed bridge I-girders. In the first step, parameters related to boundary conditions, including stiffness of supports and coupling beams, as well as material properties, including initial stiffness of concrete material, are estimated. In the second step, concrete compressive strength and damping properties are updated. The final estimates of the concrete compressive strength are used to infer the extent of damage in the girders. The obtained results agree with the literature regarding the extent of reduction in concrete compressive strength in deteriorated concrete structures.

A hybrid model-data method for seismic response reconstruction of instrumented buildings

“…Recent advances in sensing technologies and methods have significantly improved the effectiveness of structural health monitoring (SHM) and post-event damage assessment procedures while reducing uncertainties (Ghahari et al, 2022a;Limongelli and C xelebi, 2019;Malekghaini et al, 2023;Rahmani and Todorovska, 2021). However, the accuracy and associated uncertainties are notably influenced by factors such as the number, location, and type of sensors (Cheng et al, 2022;Liao et al, 2022;Lynch, 2007).…”

Enhanced Modal Participation Ratio-Based Structural Damage Identification: A New Filtering Approach Using Modal Assurance Criteria

“…In addition to development of new methods, many studies are performed by testing these methods to determine the dynamic response of unique structures [28][29][30][31]. With advancements in both literature and the technology, damage identification methods using neural networks, algorithms and hybrids of many different methods have been developed [32][33][34][35][36].…”