2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-step automatic sleep stage classification method with dubious range detection

Abstract: This approach provides reliable sleep staging results for non-dubious epochs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various approaches have been proposed, from simple rule-based decision trees (Liang et al, 2012) to supervised classifiers (e.g., support vector machines or neural networks; Pardey et al, 1996; Sousa et al, 2015), and finally unsupervised classifiers such as Hidden Markov Models (HMMs; Flexer et al, 2002, 2005; Pan et al, 2012). Because traditional PSG uses several EEG channels along with electromyogram (EMG) and electrooculogram (EOG) information, many automatic sleep scoring algorithms use much of the same data associated with PSG (Pan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches have been proposed, from simple rule-based decision trees (Liang et al, 2012) to supervised classifiers (e.g., support vector machines or neural networks; Pardey et al, 1996; Sousa et al, 2015), and finally unsupervised classifiers such as Hidden Markov Models (HMMs; Flexer et al, 2002, 2005; Pan et al, 2012). Because traditional PSG uses several EEG channels along with electromyogram (EMG) and electrooculogram (EOG) information, many automatic sleep scoring algorithms use much of the same data associated with PSG (Pan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical algorithm involves using some kind of signal processing to extract representative features followed by a classifier to assign one of the sleep stages based on these features. Some of the algorithms proposed recently include the use of support vector machines [4]- [6], hidden Markov models [7] and frequency coupling with linear discriminant analysis classification [8]. Other methods have also used artificial neural networks [2], [9], [10] and decision trees [11], [12] for classification with a variety of time, frequency, entropy [13], [14] and wavelet [10] sleep data either recorded by the researchers or using signals available from public sleep databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, to ensure that the algorithm is pragmatic and feasible in the real-world, we performed tests using various types of classifiers and determined the best one that covered the widest variety of data. Moreover, based on our survey, a few ASSC schemes have considered testing different classifiers and achieved performance improvements [9,10,12,32,41,50]. The chosen classifiers applied to the proposed method in this study include SVM, NN, KNN, NB, SVM and DT, which are among the most commonly used ones in ASSC, based on our survey.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In biomedical signal processing, it is crucial to determine the noise, artifacts and any trends present in the raw signals so that their influence in the feature extraction stage can be minimized [29,30,46,49,50]. EEG recordings have a wide variety of artifacts, some having a technical origin and others having a physiological origin mixed together with the brain signal [41,45,57,108,129].…”
Section: Signal Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation