Computers in Cardiology 2001. Vol.28 (Cat. No.01CH37287)
DOI: 10.1109/cic.2001.977678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-stage solution algorithm for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictivity of the proposed method in predicting the PAF events were 96.55%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Comparing the performance of the proposed algorithm to those of the previously reported methods in the literature shows Yang et al [42] Footprint analysis 57 -Lynn et al [36] Return map and difference map of RR intervals…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictivity of the proposed method in predicting the PAF events were 96.55%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Comparing the performance of the proposed algorithm to those of the previously reported methods in the literature shows Yang et al [42] Footprint analysis 57 -Lynn et al [36] Return map and difference map of RR intervals…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…All of these methods used AFPDB database to evaluate their approaches. The authors of [6,36,38,42] participated in Computers in Cardiology Challenge 2001 (PAF prediction challenge) and Zong et al [6] could achieve the highest score. They used the number and timing of PACs as their main discriminator to predict PAF events and achieved a sensitivity of 79% for predicting the onset of PAF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would possibly give better results than the ones expected using a valid test set. In [16] the authors used a -nearest neighbor classifier and reported no results on the training set. Different kinds of features are used in each approach: Heart rate variability (HRV) features, power spectral density of the wave and of HRV, wave morphology, atrial premature complexes (APCs) number and timing.…”
Section: Results Of Different Classification Systems For Paf Diamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with PAF give no sign before having an attack generally. On the other hand, there are some methods developed to predict PAF events in the literature including the frequency of atrial premature difference (Zong et al 2001), the P-wave changes in 60-second segments of data (Schrier et al 2001) atrial ectopic and ventricular ectopic numbers using RR intervals (Langley, et al 2001), Heart Rate Variability (HRV) time domain measures (SDNN, pNN50, RMSSD), frequency domain (Wavelet Transform) and the number of atrial and ventricular ectopic beats on data segment of 1 min, 5 min and 30 minutes (Maier et al 2001), time domain measurements (1-6 correlation coefficients, NN50, pNN50, RMSSD, SDSD), frequency domain measurements the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) using RR interval, P-wave shape, a power spectral density of the P-wave (Chazal and Heneghan 2001), HRV measurements with two-level algorithm (Lynn and Chiang 2001), FFT using RR interval and calculate the RR interval dynamics (Krstacic et al 2001) footprint analysis (Yang and Yin 2001), Spectrum, bispectrum and nonlinear measurements (Mohebbi and Ghassemian 2012), spectral changes of P wave (Alcaraz et al 2015) and Poincare plot and based on Wavelet transform measurements from HRV (Park et al 2009), standard deviation and spectral entropy measures on RR interval data (Thuraisingham 2016), spectral analysis, approximate entropy (ApEn), sample entropy (SamEn) and multiscale complexity analysis using HRV signals (Chesnokov 2008) and time domain, frequency domain, non-linear and bispectrum measures from HRV data (Boon, et al 2016), linear and non-linear HRV measurements (Narin et al 2016, Narin et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%