Handbook of Clean Energy Systems 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118991978.hces003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two‐Phase Anaerobic Digestion Process for Biogas Production for Combined Heat and Power Generation for Remote Communities

Abstract: In a conventional anaerobic digestion ( AD ) process, a feedstock rich in organic matters is converted to a combustible gas, known as biogas , containing mainly methane ( CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide, under the action of microorganisms such as methanogenic microbes in the absence of oxygen. However, the conventional AD process is slow and difficult to control for optimal biogas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, 1S-AD is a well-established system for the treatment of organic waste, characterized by a simple set-up and relatively limited investment and operating costs, and as a matter of fact most of the full-scale digestion plants in Europe (90 % of the installed AD capacity) are designed and operated as one-stage systems (Rapport et al, 2012). A major drawback in such cases is that the produced biogas is frequently reported to display a poor quality in terms of its calorific value (Zhang et al, 2015;Sunyoto et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, 1S-AD is a well-established system for the treatment of organic waste, characterized by a simple set-up and relatively limited investment and operating costs, and as a matter of fact most of the full-scale digestion plants in Europe (90 % of the installed AD capacity) are designed and operated as one-stage systems (Rapport et al, 2012). A major drawback in such cases is that the produced biogas is frequently reported to display a poor quality in terms of its calorific value (Zhang et al, 2015;Sunyoto et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%