2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-010-9393-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-permeability approach for assessing flow properties in metal foam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the pressure-drop increases with increasing airflow velocity in similar trends to those reported in [2,4,6,7,[10][11][12][13][14], but a third order (rather than second order) polynomial provides a better fit to the data over the entire velocity range. The different regimes can be identified by using a graphical separation method used by Boomsma et al [11] and adopted in many related works [4,6,9,13,15,16]. Figure 5 shows the various regimes and transitional regions including the commonly-studied Forchheimer regime, which was found to lie between 4 and 12 m sˉ¹.…”
Section: Length-normalised Pressure Drop and Regime Changesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the pressure-drop increases with increasing airflow velocity in similar trends to those reported in [2,4,6,7,[10][11][12][13][14], but a third order (rather than second order) polynomial provides a better fit to the data over the entire velocity range. The different regimes can be identified by using a graphical separation method used by Boomsma et al [11] and adopted in many related works [4,6,9,13,15,16]. Figure 5 shows the various regimes and transitional regions including the commonly-studied Forchheimer regime, which was found to lie between 4 and 12 m sˉ¹.…”
Section: Length-normalised Pressure Drop and Regime Changesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The pressure-drop across monolithic (bulk) porous metals has been widely investigated, including studies reported in [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In many engineering systems, for low (laminar) flow velocities, the relationship between pressure-drop and airflow velocity is ably described by the Hazen-Darcy or Forchheimer equation [3,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that both values do not correspond accurately, however this has also been noted in literature, as shown in Table 1. One explanation for this discrepancy is the different range of flow rates for both data sets, which can have an influence on the values as previously described by Dukhan and Minjeur [27]. Also the developed OPCF RUCS model, based on a dodecahedron cell, has simplified the foam composition into regular pores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Technical requirements on precise hydraulic measurements are very high [40][41][42]. Therefore, an elaborate setup was built for the stationary permeability measurements, to guarantee proper comparability between numerical and experimental permeabilities, see Fig.…”
Section: Permeability Measurement Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%