2012 Second International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application 2012
DOI: 10.1109/isdea.2012.607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-level Path Planning Method for On-road Autonomous Driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…clothoids or splines) with several lateral shifts of this curve [11], [9]. Each generated curve is then evaluated with regard to certain criteria.…”
Section: A Clothoid Tentacles For Trajectory Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…clothoids or splines) with several lateral shifts of this curve [11], [9]. Each generated curve is then evaluated with regard to certain criteria.…”
Section: A Clothoid Tentacles For Trajectory Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the different control logic, the shared control algorithms can be divided into two categories: the path‐based approach and the reference‐free one. In the path‐based approach, the path planning methods, including model predictive control (MPC) [30], rapidly exploring random trees [31] and geometric method [32], are utilised to identify an optimal path among all available and feasible trajectory options. The automation continuously supports the driver to follow the optimal path, keeping the driver in the control loop [33–35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naranjo et al [15] have used a fuzzy control framework to analyse AV's overtaking (passing) manoeuvres. Compared with safe trajectory planning at the operational level, route planning at the strategic level is much more important for improving the overall efficiency for the future transportation system mixed with HDVs and AVs [16]. Additionally, the route planning for AVs requires analysis at the level of individual lanes (as opposed to traditional link-level analysis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%