2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/8683472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two‐Level Metaheuristic Algorithm for the Job‐Shop Scheduling Problem

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel two-level metaheuristic algorithm, consisting of an upper-level algorithm and a lower-level algorithm, for the job-shop scheduling problem (JSP). The upper-level algorithm is a novel population-based algorithm developed to be a parameter controller for the lower-level algorithm, while the lower-level algorithm is a local search algorithm searching for an optimal schedule in the solution space of parameterized-active schedules. The lower-level algorithm’s parameters controlled by the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, we evaluate the merit and the limitation of the approaches by comparing the results of some heuristic algorithms, including Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) [15], Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [33], Tabu Search (TS) [14], Upper-level algorithm (UPLA) [26], Differentialbased Harmony Search (DHS) [16], Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) [28], Bacterial Foraging Optimization (BFO) [30], Parallel Bat Optimization (PBA) [17], and the proposed Genetic Algorithm (GA). The performances are measured based on the solution quality, the number of instances solved (NIS) optimally, and the relative error.…”
Section: Comparison Of Some Heuristic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this research, we evaluate the merit and the limitation of the approaches by comparing the results of some heuristic algorithms, including Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) [15], Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [33], Tabu Search (TS) [14], Upper-level algorithm (UPLA) [26], Differentialbased Harmony Search (DHS) [16], Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) [28], Bacterial Foraging Optimization (BFO) [30], Parallel Bat Optimization (PBA) [17], and the proposed Genetic Algorithm (GA). The performances are measured based on the solution quality, the number of instances solved (NIS) optimally, and the relative error.…”
Section: Comparison Of Some Heuristic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the two-level PSO is different from the suggested two-level metaheuristic algorithm that uses GLN-PSO's framework [25]. The authors assessed the algorithms' performance on 53 well-known benchmark instances, including FT06, FT10, FT20, and LA01-LA40 [26]. Considering the similarity and difference, they also compared their results with those of the two-level PSO [24].…”
Section: Upper-level Algorithm (Upla)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic algorithms invented by John Holland [20], have been proven to be an effective technique for many hard problems such as production-distribution planning problems [21], transportation and network design [45], Scientific workflow scheduling [43], task scheduling in cloud computing [34], [44], topology or size optimization [24]. However, it is not suitable to directly apply the aforementioned algorithms to the problems of VONs mapping in EONs, and it is necessary to make some improvements or revisions on them.…”
Section: B Bi-level Mathematical Problem and Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cruz-Chávez et al [ 19 ] proposed a parallel algorithm that generated a set of parallel working threads, where each thread performed a simulated annealing process to solve JSSP. For JSSP, Pongchairerks [ 20 ] proposed a new two-level meta-heuristic algorithm composed of an upper-level algorithm and a lower-level algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%