2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2007.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dales [21] proved the idea of emission trading on the basis of the Coase theorem and externality theory of environmental pollution, and then defined the boundary of emission rights. Bernard [22] illustrated a strategy game between Russia and competitive developing countries on the basis of an international emission permit market in the Kyoto Protocol. Weikard et al [23] assessed a framework for carbon emission reduction negotiations based on carbon trading, guaranteeing the stability and feasibility of the international Sustainability 2017, 9, 2052 4 of 27 carbon emission reduction agreement.…”
Section: Supply Chain Model With Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dales [21] proved the idea of emission trading on the basis of the Coase theorem and externality theory of environmental pollution, and then defined the boundary of emission rights. Bernard [22] illustrated a strategy game between Russia and competitive developing countries on the basis of an international emission permit market in the Kyoto Protocol. Weikard et al [23] assessed a framework for carbon emission reduction negotiations based on carbon trading, guaranteeing the stability and feasibility of the international Sustainability 2017, 9, 2052 4 of 27 carbon emission reduction agreement.…”
Section: Supply Chain Model With Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paltsev et al [28] evaluated the US greenhouse gas quota and trading plan and analyzed the Emissions Forecasting and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model. Quota transaction [19,22] CERs [21,23] Certified emission reduction EUAs [24][25][26][27] European Union emission quota AAUs [28] Assigned amount units Program trading [30] VERs [31][32][33][34][35] Voluntary emission reduction VCS [36][37][38] Voluntary carbon standard…”
Section: Supply Chain Model With Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the limiting factors in achieving stringent climate targets may be the financial, business-model and social or indeed political innovation 4 needed to drive uptake of existing technology, rather than pure technical innovation per se 5,6 . If so, the data used to calibrate IAMs and the processes included in them may be inadequate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Updated versions of the model have been used to analyze the implementation of economic instruments for GHG emissions in a second-best setting [10], to assess the strategic allocation of GHG emission allowances in the EU-wide market [50], to analyze the behavior of Russia in the Kyoto Protocol [8,7], and to assess the costs of Kyoto for Switzerland with and without international emissions trading [13].…”
Section: Gemini-e3mentioning
confidence: 99%