Symmetry and Perturbation Theory 2001
DOI: 10.1142/9789812794543_0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Dimensional Version of the Camassa-Holm Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equation coincides with the dispersionless case of the CH equation for shallow water waves in one and two dimensions, discussed in Camassa and Holm [1993]; Kruse, Scheurle and Du [2001]. It also coincides with the ATME equation (the averaged template matching equation) in two dimensions.…”
Section: The Epdiff Equationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This equation coincides with the dispersionless case of the CH equation for shallow water waves in one and two dimensions, discussed in Camassa and Holm [1993]; Kruse, Scheurle and Du [2001]. It also coincides with the ATME equation (the averaged template matching equation) in two dimensions.…”
Section: The Epdiff Equationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…8 The second term proportional to α 2 approximates (twice) the vertically averaged kinetic energy due to vertical motion. For more details of the latter approximation for the two-dimensional CH shallow water equation, see Kruse, Schreule, and Du [36].…”
Section: Zero-dispersion Shallow Water Waves In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it applies in a variety of fluid situations ranging from solitons to turbulence. The EPDiff equation coincides with the dispersionless case of the Camassa-Holm (CH) equation for shallow water in one-dimension (1-D) and two-dimensions (2-D), discussed in [4,30]. Applying viscosity to the incompressible, three-dimensional (3-D) analog of this equation produces the Navier-Stokes-α model for the averaged fluid equations (see, e.g., [8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%