2018
DOI: 10.1142/s2591728518500366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Dimensional Acoustic Tangential Derivative Boundary Element Method Including Viscous and Thermal Losses

Abstract: In recent years, the boundary element method has shown to be an interesting alternative to the finite element method for modeling of viscous and thermal acoustic losses. Current implementations rely on finite-difference tangential pressure derivatives for the coupling of the fundamental equations, which can be a shortcoming of the method. This finite-difference coupling method is removed here and replaced by an extra set of tangential derivative boundary element equations. Increased stability and error reducti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the approach in half-pace problems, discussed in Section 5.1.2, aero-acoustic problems are adapted for the BEM by revising the Green's function [308][309][310]. Recently the BEM in acoustics has been adapted to model viscous and thermal losses [311][312][313].…”
Section: Aero-acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the approach in half-pace problems, discussed in Section 5.1.2, aero-acoustic problems are adapted for the BEM by revising the Green's function [308][309][310]. Recently the BEM in acoustics has been adapted to model viscous and thermal losses [311][312][313].…”
Section: Aero-acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] Compared with the traditional finite element method (FEM) commonly used in topology optimization, the boundary element method (BEM) seems to be more favorable when optimizing the distribution of sound-absorbing materials in the exterior sound field, [15][16][17][18] since only the boundaries need to be discretized and the Sommerfeld boundary condition is automatically satisfied. [19][20][21] Similarly, the BEM is used in many situations. [22][23][24][25][26] The traditional topology optimization finds the optimal solution at a specific frequency, and thus the results may not work for another frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topology optimization technology is one of the powerful tools to find the optimal distribution of sound‐absorbing materials 11‐14 . Compared with the traditional finite element method (FEM) commonly used in topology optimization, the boundary element method (BEM) seems to be more favorable when optimizing the distribution of sound‐absorbing materials in the exterior sound field, 15‐18 since only the boundaries need to be discretized and the Sommerfeld boundary condition is automatically satisfied 19‐21 . Similarly, the BEM is used in many situations 22‐26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%