2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06551.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two‐bougie technique for safer oro‐ to nasotracheal tube exchange in a difficult airway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have espoused the idea of performing a tube change during the case from nasal to oral or oral to nasal depending on when during the procedure the desired cavity is to be addressed. 4,5 However, not only is this a time-consuming process, but also, it is a major inconvenience, usually requiring removing the drapes or breaking the sterile field, often with a surgical site open, and requiring reprepping and draping. In addition, it is not ideal for the anesthesiologist because the bed position may have changed and the site is now replete with surgical fluids or bleeding, and the airway maybe obscured from edema or repositioning of structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have espoused the idea of performing a tube change during the case from nasal to oral or oral to nasal depending on when during the procedure the desired cavity is to be addressed. 4,5 However, not only is this a time-consuming process, but also, it is a major inconvenience, usually requiring removing the drapes or breaking the sterile field, often with a surgical site open, and requiring reprepping and draping. In addition, it is not ideal for the anesthesiologist because the bed position may have changed and the site is now replete with surgical fluids or bleeding, and the airway maybe obscured from edema or repositioning of structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous techniques have been described to subsequently convert an oral ETT to a nasal ETT. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] In 1995, Nakata and Niimi 4 described an oral to nasal ETT exchange with an ETT exchanger "connector" (Patil Two-Part Intubation Catheter; Cook, Bloomington, IN) which did not require direct visualization of the glottis during passage of the nasal ETT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%