2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11859-018-1304-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Trustworthy Group Identifying Trust Metric for P2P Service Sharing Economy Based on Personal Social Network of Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al 27 used social trust based on distance and similarity to improve cooperative communication quality. Zhu 28 proposed a trustworthy group trust metric for P2P service sharing (TMPSS) economy based on personal social network (PSN) of users. This method considers various factors such as social circle similarity, preference similarity, interaction degree, and node reliability and produces an ordered set of reliable nodes to prevent activities of unreliable nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li et al 27 used social trust based on distance and similarity to improve cooperative communication quality. Zhu 28 proposed a trustworthy group trust metric for P2P service sharing (TMPSS) economy based on personal social network (PSN) of users. This method considers various factors such as social circle similarity, preference similarity, interaction degree, and node reliability and produces an ordered set of reliable nodes to prevent activities of unreliable nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, the existing methods have been effective and successful in their targeted applications, 35 but are insufficient or face some technical challenges when applied 12 ü ü ü Kerrache et al 13 ü ü ü Li and Song 14 ü Minhas et al 15 ü ü Lu et al 16 ü ü Cheng et al 6 ü ü Kerrache et al 17 ü ü DoS, DDoS Kerrache et al 18 ü ü Black hole Kerrache et al 19 ü ü Alishev et al 20 ü Li et al 21 ü ü ü Zhang et al 22 ü Mantas et al 23 ü Drop Yang and Wang 24 ü Gu et al 25 ü Al-Qurishi et al 26 ü Sybil Li et al 27 ü Zhu 28 ü Wu et al 29 ü On-off Zhang et al 30 ü Liu et al 31 ü Chen et al 32 ü Raj and Balasubramanian 33 ü ü ü Kerrache et al 34 ü ü ü ü…”
Section: Social Characteristics and Social Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%