2005
DOI: 10.1520/gtj12679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A True Triaxial Apparatus for Soil Testing with Mixed Boundary Conditions

Abstract: The mechanical description of a new true triaxial apparatus for soil testing is presented. The design took into consideration flexibility in accommodating different specimen sizes, easy assembly procedure, and well-controlled boundary conditions. The apparatus can perform stress-controlled and strain controlled experiments. It is well instrumented with load, displacement, and pressure sensors and has the capabilities to capture strain localization and shear band development. Verification experiments were condu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the peak friction angle ( ds,p ) increases as the normal stress decreases, with the rate of increase depending on the initial density of the sample. Other researchers that measured the constant-volume friction angle of sands (e.g., Wang and Lade 2001;Alshibli and Williams 2005) concluded that cv and its direct shear test counterpart residual friction angle, res , are material parameters that are independent of both the initial sand density and the level of confining stress. Results presented in Fig.…”
Section: Direct Shear Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the peak friction angle ( ds,p ) increases as the normal stress decreases, with the rate of increase depending on the initial density of the sample. Other researchers that measured the constant-volume friction angle of sands (e.g., Wang and Lade 2001;Alshibli and Williams 2005) concluded that cv and its direct shear test counterpart residual friction angle, res , are material parameters that are independent of both the initial sand density and the level of confining stress. Results presented in Fig.…”
Section: Direct Shear Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For geomaterials, there have been some failure criteria that consider the effect of σ 2 on shear strength [22]. In this section, we collect some test data of true triaxial tests from Reades and Green [35], Alshibli and Williams [36], Lade and Wang [37], Hu et al [38], Jiang et al [39], Mogi [40], Takahashi and Koide [41], Haimson and Chang [42], Sutherland and Mesdary [45], Shi et al [46], Ma and Haimson [47], Chang and Haimson [48], and Liu [49]. Comparisons are made from the prediction capacity of both shear strength and deformation among the four failure criteria of the M-C, L-D, SMP, and the GMC.…”
Section: Comparisons With Commonly Used Failure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure5displays the shear strength τ f evaluated by GMC-L according to some true triaxial tests from the literature[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], which suggests that for each fixed σ 3 , τ f increases as b increases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sophisticated stress-controlled tests can simulate earthquake loading or other field situations (Sassa and others, 2004). Research has also continued to develop true triaxial test systems in which stresses on all three principal axes differ independently (Alshibli and Williams, 2005;AnhDan and others, 2006), unlike traditional triaxial systems in which only the lateral confining stress and axial stress can differ.…”
Section: Recent Improvements In Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%