2018
DOI: 10.2144/btn-2017-0100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Triple Co-Culture Method to Investigate the Effect of Macrophages and Fibroblasts on Myoblast Proliferation and Migration

Abstract: The communication between nonmyogenic cells, such as macrophages and fibroblasts, and myoblasts is crucial for successful skeletal muscle repair. In vitro co-culture methods can be used to increase our understanding of these cellular interactions; however, current protocols are restricted to two, often physically separate, cell populations. Here, we demonstrate a novel, inexpensive in vitro triple co-culture method that facilitates the co-culture of at least three cell populations with some degree of cell–cell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, myoblasts cultured in the presence of M1 macrophages (Mϕ + LPS + ) were present with a relative cell number of 297 ± 68% which was also not significantly different to myoblasts cultured with LPS alone. M0 macrophages (Mϕ + LPS − ) themselves (Figure 3d) continued to significantly increase ( p < 0.05) relative myoblasts numbers from 141 ± 4% to 220 ± 15% in SFM as previously shown (Venter & Niesler, 2018b). Myoblasts maintained in the presence of LPS (Mϕ − LPS + ) were present with relative cell numbers of 145 ± 6% which was not significantly different compared to the control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, myoblasts cultured in the presence of M1 macrophages (Mϕ + LPS + ) were present with a relative cell number of 297 ± 68% which was also not significantly different to myoblasts cultured with LPS alone. M0 macrophages (Mϕ + LPS − ) themselves (Figure 3d) continued to significantly increase ( p < 0.05) relative myoblasts numbers from 141 ± 4% to 220 ± 15% in SFM as previously shown (Venter & Niesler, 2018b). Myoblasts maintained in the presence of LPS (Mϕ − LPS + ) were present with relative cell numbers of 145 ± 6% which was not significantly different compared to the control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Most co-culture studies involve two cell types, owing to an increased complexity in establishing a stable system when more cell types are involved (Goers et al, 2014). There are also studies reporting the use of three (Venter and Niesler, 2018;Churm et al, 2019;Lin et al, 2019) or even four cell types (Zhang et al, 2009;DesRochers et al, 2015). Different strategies to co-culture cells in 3D exist, each allowing for a different degree of contact between the cell types.…”
Section: Co-cultures With the Application For In Vitro Tissue Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 20b ] These cells have a significant impact on myogenic migration and proliferation in vitro if cultured together, as reported by Venter et al. [ 138 ] Their experiments investigated the proliferative and migratory effects on myoblasts, compared between three experimental groups: myoblast/macrophage cocultures, myoblast/fibroblast cocultures, and a triple coculture with all three cell types. In individual cocultures, fibroblast cells would promote the migration of myoblasts whereas macrophages could only promote their proliferation.…”
Section: External Stimulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the promoted migratory effects seen in the myoblast/fibroblast coculture were not reproducible in the triple coculture, indicating that particular response was inhibited in some way by the presence of the macrophages. [ 138 ] The exact mechanisms for these responses are as of yet unknown.…”
Section: External Stimulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%