Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-34416-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tree-Based Similarity for Evaluating Concept Proximities in an Ontology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The type of data taken as input by the function is varying depending on the precision degree required. Type of data constrains the specific technique that can be used for effectively evaluating function results as well (using, e.g., structure-based, graph-based or attribute-based techniques) (Lin 1998, Rodrýguez & Egenhofer 2003, Blanchard, Kuntz, Harzallah & Briand 2006. Finally, the measure should be meaningful.…”
Section: Cm: Ueml C Ueml C →mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of data taken as input by the function is varying depending on the precision degree required. Type of data constrains the specific technique that can be used for effectively evaluating function results as well (using, e.g., structure-based, graph-based or attribute-based techniques) (Lin 1998, Rodrýguez & Egenhofer 2003, Blanchard, Kuntz, Harzallah & Briand 2006. Finally, the measure should be meaningful.…”
Section: Cm: Ueml C Ueml C →mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using different degrees of precision may be useful in order to to master complex correspondences and when dealing incomplete representation mappings and/or ontology.The work is in progress on deriving measures of correspondence between pairs of modelling constructs, providing evidence of kinds of correspondence with various degrees of precision. The measures are inspired by measures used to compare objects in the areas of classification theory and knowledge engineering (Lin 1998, Rodrýguez & Egenhofer 2003, Blanchard, Kuntz, Harzallah & Briand 2006.…”
Section: Language and Construct Correspondencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such similarity measures can be based on comparing features that describe the objects, and a semantic similarity measure uses the relationships which exist between the features of the items being compared [ 11 ]. Blanchard et al have established a general model for comparing semantic similarity measures based on a subsumption hierarchy [ 12 ]. They divide tree-based similarities into two categories: those based only on the hierarchical relationships between the terms [ 13 ], and those combining additional statistics such as term frequency in a corpus [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%