A Transnational Agri-Food System for Whom? The Struggle for Hegemony at Rio+20

Abstract

Food has been one of the most debated and contested discourses in recent global environmental governance without this fact being reflected, however, in management and organizational studies (MOS). In this paper, we analyze the different positions taken in relation to the transnational agri-food system by the state sector, the private sector and civil society actors and we map key differences and similarities in the discourses of these groups at the influential 2012 Rio+20 Conference. Using neo-Gramscian discourse theory, we uncover the different politico-economic interests that exist and show how these different actors deal with the agri-food system. We demonstrate that international NGOs and grassroots social movements are very diverse in how they approach the question of food security, which in turn is reflected in how they vary in their approach to doing politics. This analysis contributes to our understanding of how hegemony is organized, highlighting the important role of different civil society actors in either maintaining or resisting hegemonic approaches to the transnational agri-food system. KEYWORDS | Agri-food system, neo-Gramscian discourse approach, civil society, Rio+20, sustainable development. RESUMO RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas | FGV/EAESP

TRANSNATIONAL GOVERNANCE REGIMES IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH: MULTINATIONALS, STATES AND NGOs AS POLITICAL ACTORS

“…Transnational NGOs also offer limited accountability; their most important donors are often kept secret and policy is decided by officials that are often appointed rather than elected. Fontoura, Bharucha, and Bohm (2016) The interaction between global standards emerging from multi-stakeholder partnerships in the North and local practices in the South is the focus of a paper by Schounten et al (2016).…”

Sistemas agroalimentarios sostenibles: el caso de la cadena de valor del aguacate en México

“…En síntesis, las condiciones políticas, la alineación específica de organizaciones públicas y privadas (Fontoura et al, 2016), una cv conducida por transnacionales extranjeras integradas verticalmente que buscan alcanzar la eficiencia (Querejazu, 2020;Martín-Carbajal, 2016) -lo que les permite evitar sanciones por las consecuencias deseadas o indeseadas de sus acciones (Bentia, 2021)-, favoreció que se establecieran en México estructuras de gobernanza dominadas por el poder corporativo de estas transnacionales, creando instituciones y alterando su funcionamiento de acuerdo con sus intereses (Hernández-López, 2012), para mantener el control nacional e internacional.…”