2004
DOI: 10.1071/ah040275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transitional care service for elderly chronic disease patients at risk of readmission

Abstract: Background: Multiple hospital admissions, especially those related to chronic disease, represent a particular challenge to the acute health care sector in Australia.Objective: To determine whether a nurse-led chronic disease management model of transitional care reduced readmissions to acute care. Design:A quasi-experimental controlled trial. Setting:A large tertiary metropolitan teaching hospital. Participants: 166 general medical patients aged у65 years with either a history of readmissions to acute care or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…15 The implementation of these services was associated with a decrease in attendances by older mented in other parts of the country with varying success. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The quintessence of such services is an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to assist in the acute hospital and post-discharge care of older people at risk of repeated hospital presentations. The emphasis has been on returning these patients to and maintaining them in the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The implementation of these services was associated with a decrease in attendances by older mented in other parts of the country with varying success. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The quintessence of such services is an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to assist in the acute hospital and post-discharge care of older people at risk of repeated hospital presentations. The emphasis has been on returning these patients to and maintaining them in the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 A similar negative result was noted in an Australian trial involving 166 high-risk older medical patients who were reviewed by a chronic disease nurse consultant before discharge and then seen again at a nurse-led clinic within two weeks of discharge. 58 Another trial evaluated a re-engineered hospital discharge program which centred on a nurse advocate who closely liaised with patients and carers during hospital stay, arranged follow-up appointments, undertook medication reconciliation, conducted patient education with an individualised instruction booklet (that was also sent to their primary care provider), and provided a written discharge plan combined with a telephone call from a clinical pharmacist 2-4 days after discharge to reinforce the discharge plan and review medications. 59 This resulted in a significant 30% decrease in hospital utilisation (ED visits and readmissions) at 30 days after discharge (P = 0.009), with a nonsignificant trend towards lower readmissions (28% decrease, P = 0.09).…”
Section: Studies Of Integrated Pre-and Postdischarge Multicomponent Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospital clinical directors and managers will need to negotiate the extra funding, personnel and stakeholder buy-in required to allow such programs to operate successfully. 58 …”
Section: Practice Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the ICM approach may therefore have been influenced or strengthened by the use of the best available evidence relating care needs to care provision. For example, the COPD review noted the use of protocols in some studies (Rabow et al, 2003) or the MDT reviews noted that, most often, multidisciplinary teams were a component of the program or strategy (Brand et al, 2004).…”
Section: Narrative Summary Of Common Findings From Individual Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the individual review topics dealt with single interventions illustrating an ICM approach, most interventions were multicomponent (Crotty et al, 2004;Beland et al, 2006;Rabow et al, 2003;Brand et al, 2004). For example, care planning approaches often used standardised tools, case conferencing, case management and a multidisciplinary team.…”
Section: Narrative Summary Of Common Findings From Individual Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%