2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep34706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transgenic approach to control hemipteran insects by expressing insecticidal genes under phloem-specific promoters

Abstract: The first generation transgenic crops used strong constitutive promoters for transgene expression. However, tissue-specific expression is desirable for more precise targeting of transgenes. Moreover, piercing/sucking insects, which are generally resistant to insecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins, have emerged as a major pests since the introduction of transgenic crops expressing these toxins. Phloem-specific promoters isolated from Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) were used for the expression of two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This consideration is of particular importance to GPM strategies such as those described here which aim to limit any deleterious effect until after the density-dependent stage. Additionally, alternative arthropod-specific neuroactive effectors could be tested for increased penetrance, for example the spider [31] or sea anemone [32] toxins. A class of potentially highly potent but as yet unrealised neuroactive effectors are the endogenous insect neuropeptides [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This consideration is of particular importance to GPM strategies such as those described here which aim to limit any deleterious effect until after the density-dependent stage. Additionally, alternative arthropod-specific neuroactive effectors could be tested for increased penetrance, for example the spider [31] or sea anemone [32] toxins. A class of potentially highly potent but as yet unrealised neuroactive effectors are the endogenous insect neuropeptides [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgenes encoding the spider knottin Hv1a (or its close otholog ω‐hexatoxin‐Ar1a) have been engineered into cotton, tobacco (alone or as a fusion to thioredoxin, onion leaf lectin, or Cry1Ac), poplar (fused to a C‐terminal fragment of CryIAb), and Arabidopsis (as a fusion to GNA or luteovirus coat protein). Transgenic plants expressing Hv1a/Ar1a are more resistant to a diverse range of insect pests, including bollworms ( Helicoverpa armigera ) and leafworms ( Spodoptera littoralis ) on cotton, peach‐potato aphids ( Myzus persicae ) on Arabidopsis , gypsy moth ( Lymantria dispar ) on poplar, and peach‐potato aphids, bollworms, leafworms, and whiteflies ( Bemisia tabaci ) on tobacco. In addition, tobacco plants engineered to express Magi‐6, a 36‐residue knottin from venom of the hexathelid spider Macrothele gigas , have greater resistance to fall armyworms ( S. frugiperda ) …”
Section: Crops With Fangs: Engineering Plants To Express Spider Knottmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CaMV35S promoter directs expression to both phloem and other tissue in dicots [ 54 , 55 ] and the expectations from transformation with the rolC promoter was to distinguish effects mainly restricted to phloem tissue to those in other parts of the leaf. As an example, in an earlier report, tobacco and chickpea were transformed with a gene encoding a leaf agglutinin protein using either CaMV35S or rolC -directed expression and the effects evaluated with GPA nymphs (on tobacco) or Aphids craccivora nymphs (on chickpea) [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%