2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transformer-based multi-features fusion model for prediction of conversion in mild cognitive impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the evaluation metrics used differed considerably across image analysis tasks and studies making direct comparisons challenging (Table II), there was a clear performance improvement when Transf/Attention mechanisms were used across studies. Some of the studies demonstrated either large (≥ 5%) differences against the best baseline models [21,35,46,79,101,108,117,121,122,126,127,135], or moderate (<5%) but consistent improvements across different metrics evaluated [13,18,39,53,54,56,57,62,70,78,91,94,105] and/ or data used [98,100,103,105,108]. In the following paragraphs, we detail studies that followed our 2 objective generalisation criteria (see Methods): whether a model was a) trained on large data (>2,000 images, Table I) and/ or b) analysed data from heterogeneous modalities, and/ or multiple modalities and/ or multiple organ areas and/ or multiple datasets of the same modality and organ.…”
Section: Downstream Tasks and Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the evaluation metrics used differed considerably across image analysis tasks and studies making direct comparisons challenging (Table II), there was a clear performance improvement when Transf/Attention mechanisms were used across studies. Some of the studies demonstrated either large (≥ 5%) differences against the best baseline models [21,35,46,79,101,108,117,121,122,126,127,135], or moderate (<5%) but consistent improvements across different metrics evaluated [13,18,39,53,54,56,57,62,70,78,91,94,105] and/ or data used [98,100,103,105,108]. In the following paragraphs, we detail studies that followed our 2 objective generalisation criteria (see Methods): whether a model was a) trained on large data (>2,000 images, Table I) and/ or b) analysed data from heterogeneous modalities, and/ or multiple modalities and/ or multiple organ areas and/ or multiple datasets of the same modality and organ.…”
Section: Downstream Tasks and Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) conversion prediction field, most previous studies suffer from overfitting issues and ignore interpretability issues in medical practice. Zheng et al [12] propose a transformer-based prediction model, which fuses cortical features containing rich ROI level information to alleviate the overfitting issues and introduces occlusion analysis to improve the model interpretability. This method can aid in the clinical prediction of MCI conversion and can assess the impact of different brain regions on model decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%