2011
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.03561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Transformation Framework for the Compositional Interchange Format for Hybrid Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design of the logic controller starts with a dynamic model of the process that is developed in the process simulator gPROMS (PSE (2010)), and a set of informal specifications for the logic controller as described in the section above. The gPROMS model is algorithmically transformed to the CIF (see Hendriks et al (2011)). The informal specification is used to design the logic controller within a multi-formalism environment utilizing the methodology and the tool described in the previous section.…”
Section: Results Of the Model-based Work Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of the logic controller starts with a dynamic model of the process that is developed in the process simulator gPROMS (PSE (2010)), and a set of informal specifications for the logic controller as described in the section above. The gPROMS model is algorithmically transformed to the CIF (see Hendriks et al (2011)). The informal specification is used to design the logic controller within a multi-formalism environment utilizing the methodology and the tool described in the previous section.…”
Section: Results Of the Model-based Work Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both cases are handled by applying text to model (T2M), model to model (M2M) and model to text (M2T) transformations. Based on previous experiences during the development of the Compositional Interchange Format [8], [9], transformations consist of many small transformations, each with their own concern, which can be composed into complete tool chains. In the next subsections, code generation and scheduling are explained in more detail.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation framework used for model transformations to and from CIF is based on OMG [39] standards: Class diagrams, in the form of Ecore metamodels, are used for the conceptual definition of CIF; QVTo is used as the model to model transformation language; and Acceleo is used as the model to text (code) transformation language [22,48].…”
Section: Overview Of Work On Cifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For defining chains of transformations, the ToolDef [22] language has been defined. A syntax aware ToolDef editor has been generated by means of EMFText [48].…”
Section: Overview Of Work On Cifmentioning
confidence: 99%