1975
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(75)90708-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transformation-dependent difference in the heparan sulfate associated with the cell surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

1976
1976
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus an alteration in the overall level of heparan sulphate sulphation is almost certainly not a factor in the ECM alterations which are observed in transformed keratinocytes (Brown & Parkinson, 1984;; although we cannot rule out the possibility that changes in the distribution of ester (o) sulphate groups may have occurred, since this would not have been detected by the methods employed here. Furthermore, these results contrast the many other reports of undersulphated heparan sulphates being produced by other types of transformed cells (Underhill & Keller, 1975;Winterbourne & Mora, 1981;Stamatoglou & Keller, 1983;David & van den Berghe, 1983;Robinson et al, 1984).…”
contrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus an alteration in the overall level of heparan sulphate sulphation is almost certainly not a factor in the ECM alterations which are observed in transformed keratinocytes (Brown & Parkinson, 1984;; although we cannot rule out the possibility that changes in the distribution of ester (o) sulphate groups may have occurred, since this would not have been detected by the methods employed here. Furthermore, these results contrast the many other reports of undersulphated heparan sulphates being produced by other types of transformed cells (Underhill & Keller, 1975;Winterbourne & Mora, 1981;Stamatoglou & Keller, 1983;David & van den Berghe, 1983;Robinson et al, 1984).…”
contrasting
confidence: 91%
“…One important factor in this loss of ECM is probably a decrease in the sulphation of heparan sulphate, which has been reported in several systems (Underhill & Keller, 1975;Winterbourne & Mora, 1981; Stamatoglou & Keller, 1983;David & van den Berghe, 1983;Robinson et al, 1984). This decrease in sulphation reduces the affinity of heparan sulphate for fibronectin (Stamatoglou & Keller, 1983;Robinson et al, 1984) and may therefore interfere with the complex interactions between the various glycoprotein and proteoglycan components of the ECM, in which heparan sulphate is thought to play a central role (Gallagher et al, 1986 (Rheinwald, 1980), as previously described (Brown & Parkinson, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In numerous reports a change in glycosaminoglycan synthesis upon neoplastic transformation has been described (Underhill & Keller, 1975;Winterbourne & Mora, 1978Keller et al, 1980;Fransson et al, 1982;Underhill & Toole, 1982;Shanley et al, 1983). When analysed for transformation-associated changes, spontaneously transformed MuMG cells that produce invasive tumours in vivo were found to produce basement-membrane heparan sulphate of lower Mr and of lower anionic charge density than the untransformed parental counterpart (David & Van den Berghe, 1983).…”
Section: Vol 248mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) mAb 48.7 affinity-purified proteoglycan (CSPG) J (11,20,27,33,34,55) and viral transformation can block proteoglycan synthesis (43). There is evidence that neoplastic cells can synthesize proteoglycans that are chemically modified, e.g., undersulfated (30,40,56,63), or structurally altered, e.g., keratan sulfate glycosaminoglycan chains (39,44). Such modified proteoglycans may account for the fact that transformed ceils fail to assemble a pericellular matrix as compared with their normal counterparts (16,21,25,57,58).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%