2023
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2023.3234989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Transfer Learning Based Cross-Subject Generic Model for Continuous Estimation of Finger Joint Angles From a New User

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, we deliberately avoid unreasonable or poor data caused by collection errors in NinaproDB2. In comparison to the subject adversarial knowledge (SAK) transfer learning strategy proposed by Long et al (2023) , we adopted the more efficient RoFormer model as the main body of the cross-subject model and utilized the μ -law normalization method to achieve more accurate estimation. Furthermore, we also simplify the structure of the domain discriminator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, we deliberately avoid unreasonable or poor data caused by collection errors in NinaproDB2. In comparison to the subject adversarial knowledge (SAK) transfer learning strategy proposed by Long et al (2023) , we adopted the more efficient RoFormer model as the main body of the cross-subject model and utilized the μ -law normalization method to achieve more accurate estimation. Furthermore, we also simplify the structure of the domain discriminator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, based on the fact that extracting highly correlated inter-subject features from multi-subject training can improve model generalizability, and current MB and MF methods' lengthy training times preclude the rapid deployment across subjects [68], the capability for effective transfer learning becomes crucial. Current transfer learning strategies include retraining only the fully connected layers in CNN, Bi-LSTM, and CNN-LSTM networks for parameter sharing [30], [140], [192], adjusting CNN weights based on domain-invariant features and loss functions in dual-stream CNN [101], as well as the subject adversarial knowledge (SAK) strategy in [152].…”
Section: ) Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, TL has been proven to be beneficial in classificationbased myoelectric control for model calibration (inter-session) [16], [18], for multi-subject models (subject-independent) [19], adapting a pretrained model to a previously unseen end-user with minimal data (cross-subject) [20], and success in other EMG-based applications [21]. Ameri et al demonstrated model calibration using TL, which lessened the performance degradation caused by confounding factors such as electrode shift and physiological parameters changing over multiple sessions [16], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campbell et al then extended this subjectindependent scenario to a cross-subject scenario by adapting to a novel end-user with minimal subject-supplied data, even outperforming the intra-subject scenario despite having less end-user data [20]. Likewise, Long et al have shown this TL strategy was valid outside EMG gesture recognition by outperforming within-subject continuous finger kinematic prediction models using subject adversarial transfer learning [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%