2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-018-0175-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transdiagnostic neuroanatomical signature of psychiatric illness

Abstract: Despite an increasing focus on transdiagnostic approaches to mental health, it remains unclear whether different diagnostic categories share a common neuronatomical basis. The current investigation sought to investigate whether a transdiagnostic set of structural alterations characterized schizophrenia, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and determine whether any such alterations reflected markers of psychiatric illness or pre-existing familial vulnerability. A total… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(43 reference statements)
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides evidence for reliable neuroanatomical alternations in FEP, expressed above and beyond site-related differences in anti-psychotic medication, scanning parameters and recruitment criteria. With the increasing availability of larger datasets, future multi-centre mega-analyses could investigate the diagnostic specificity of these findings by integrating the data collected from people with different psychiatric diagnoses (Ellison-Wright & Bullmore, 2010;Gong et al, 2019). Conflict of interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides evidence for reliable neuroanatomical alternations in FEP, expressed above and beyond site-related differences in anti-psychotic medication, scanning parameters and recruitment criteria. With the increasing availability of larger datasets, future multi-centre mega-analyses could investigate the diagnostic specificity of these findings by integrating the data collected from people with different psychiatric diagnoses (Ellison-Wright & Bullmore, 2010;Gong et al, 2019). Conflict of interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such tailoring is based on the assumption that a diagnosis provides information about the causes of the patient's disorder and that tailoring treatment to a diagnosis will ensure a good response and prognosis. However, the wisdom of overemphasizing a diagnosis is challenged by new evidence from neuroimaging studies, [4][5][6][7][8] genetic studies, [9][10][11] and riskprediction studies, [12][13][14] which reveal that major etiological findings are transdiagnostic. Moreover, since publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Third Edition) (DSM-III), 15 evidence has accumulated that sets of disorders and symptoms predictably co-occur.…”
Section: And the Public Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In healthy individuals, the neural substrate of the p ‐factor appears to encompass a distributed network of brain structures. Volumetric studies implicate grey matter reductions in prefrontal (Snyder, Hankin, Sandman, Head, & Davis, ), striatal (Gong et al, ), occipital and cerebellar regions (Moberget et al, ; Romer et al, ) in association with greater expression of p . In terms of white matter integrity, commonly indexed using diffusion imaging metrics, reduced integrity in callosal (Riem et al, ) and pontine‐cerebellar (Romer et al, ) pathways are also linked to the expression of a p ‐factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%