2022
DOI: 10.2196/28300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Transdiagnostic, Emotion Regulation App (Eda) for Children: Design, Development, and Lessons Learned

Abstract: Background Digital interventions, including mobile apps, represent a promising means of providing effective mental health support to children and young people. Despite the increased availability of mental health apps, there is a significant gap for this age group, especially for children (aged 10-12 years). Research investigating the effectiveness and development process of child mental health apps is limited, and the field faces persistent issues in relation to low user uptake and engagement, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coproducing interventions with young people may help improve the acceptability and feasibility of the end product, which, in turn, can improve intervention effectiveness [ 25 , 26 ]. Coproduction actively involves relevant stakeholder groups in the design process to help ensure that the technology developed meets their needs and is usable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coproducing interventions with young people may help improve the acceptability and feasibility of the end product, which, in turn, can improve intervention effectiveness [ 25 , 26 ]. Coproduction actively involves relevant stakeholder groups in the design process to help ensure that the technology developed meets their needs and is usable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 10 implementation variables were examined, of which 8 were from the Proctor model: acceptability (perceived usefulness and satisfaction with a technology), appropriateness (fitness for purpose), feasibility (extent to which a technology was successfully used), fidelity (implementation as intended), cost (financial impact of technology implementation), adoption (technology uptake and use), penetration (spread or reach of the technology), and sustainability (sustained uptake by users or maintenance or integration of a technology within a health care service). Two additional relevant outcomes were added: coproduction (user involvement in intervention development and evaluation) and engagement (adherence and dropout) [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%