2003
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00253.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Transcultural Integrative Model for Ethical Decision Making in Counseling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Culturally aware assessment practices may allow behavior analysts to obtain important cultural information about clients in order to understand their worldviews. Culturally aware assessment may also allow behavior analysts to identify any potential cultural barriers such as modalities of communication and expression of emotions (see Garcia et al 2003).…”
Section: Developing Cultural Awareness Of Clientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culturally aware assessment practices may allow behavior analysts to obtain important cultural information about clients in order to understand their worldviews. Culturally aware assessment may also allow behavior analysts to identify any potential cultural barriers such as modalities of communication and expression of emotions (see Garcia et al 2003).…”
Section: Developing Cultural Awareness Of Clientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This second group focuses specifically on the ETHIC model (2000), the Levy paradigm (1973; 1976), Kenyon's model (1998), the integrative transcultural model by García et al (2003), and the inclusive model by Chenoweth and McAuliffe (2005).…”
Section: Methodologies That Do Not Propose a Hierarchy Between Ethicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, it should be made clear, is just one of the ways that ethical decision-making methodologies can be classified (García et al, 2003;Cottone and Claus, 2000;Minor and Petocz, 2003).…”
Section: Methodologies That Propose a Hierarchy Between Ethical Princmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors affecting moral reasoning, including gender, age, nationality, religion etc., have also been empirically examined by a large number of studies (for literature reviews, Ford & Richardson, 1994;Loe, Ferrell, & Mansfield, 2000;O'Fallon & Butterfield, 2005;Craft, 2013) on the basis of several approaches not, however, without limitations (Randall & Gibson, 1990;Bartlett, 2003;Weber & McGivern, 2010). There are also models that recommend a variety of steps with a more pragmatic approach, such as the identification of the problem, the collection of information, consultation of ethical guidelines, the generation of alternative decisions, an examination of the consequences of each decision and the choice of the best course of action (for a review, Cottone & Claus, 2000;Garcia et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%