A Transcription and Translation Protocol for Sensitive Cross-Cultural Team Research

Clark, Lauren; Birkhead, Ana Sanchez; Fernàndez, Cèsar; Egger, Marlene J.

doi:10.1177/1049732317726761

Cited by 68 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 38 publications

(66 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conceptual translation between languages and cultures is recognised to be an issue in both qualitative and quantitative research (Clark 2017; Al‐Amer 2015; Stevelink 2013). Regmi 2010 discusses the issues of translation (a direct and literal word‐for‐word process) and transliteration (a process of translating meaning which may not be word‐for‐word) in undertaking qualitative research in different language and cultural groups.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Downe

Finlayson²,

Tunçalp

et al. 2019

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

102

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Antenatal care (ANC) is a core component of maternity care. However, both quality of care provision and rates of attendance vary widely between and within countries. Qualitative research can assess factors underlying variation, including acceptability, feasibility, and the values and beliefs that frame provision and uptake of ANC programmes.  This synthesis links to the Cochrane Reviews of the effectiveness of different antenatal models of care. It was designed to inform the World Health Organization guidelines for a positive pregnancy experience and to provide insights for the design and implementation of improved antenatal care in the future. Objectives To identify, appraise, and synthesise qualitative studies exploring: · Women’s views and experiences of attending ANC; and factors influencing the uptake of ANC arising from women’s accounts; · Healthcare providers’ views and experiences of providing ANC; and factors influencing the provision of ANC arising from the accounts of healthcare providers. Search methods To find primary studies we searched MEDLINE, Ovid; Embase, Ovid; CINAHL, EbscoHost; PsycINFO, EbscoHost; AMED, EbscoHost; LILACS, VHL; and African Journals Online (AJOL) from January 2000 to February 2019. We handsearched reference lists of included papers and checked the contents pages of 50 relevant journals through Zetoc alerts received during the searching phase. Selection criteria We included studies that used qualitative methodology and that met our quality threshold; that explored the views and experiences of routine ANC among healthy, pregnant and postnatal women or among healthcare providers offering this care, including doctors, midwives, nurses, lay health workers and traditional birth attendants; and that took place in any setting where ANC was provided.  We excluded studies of ANC programmes designed for women with specific complications. We also excluded studies of programmes that focused solely on antenatal education. Data collection and analysis Two authors undertook data extraction, logged study characteristics, and assessed study quality. We used meta‐ethnographic and Framework techniques to code and categorise study data. We developed findings from the data and presented these in a 'Summary of Qualitative Findings' (SoQF) table. We assessed confidence in each finding using GRADE‐CERQual. We used these findings to generate higher‐level explanatory thematic domains. We then developed two lines of argument syntheses, one from service user data, and one from healthcare provider data. In addition, we mapped the findings to relevant Cochrane effectiveness reviews to assess how far review authors had taken account of behavioural and organisational factors in the design and implementation of the interventions they tested. We also translated the findings into logic models to explain full, partial and no up...

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Downe

Finlayson²,

Tunçalp

et al. 2019

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

102

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Identifying information such as pastor names were removed or abbreviated and Spanish transcripts were translated to English using standard protocols. 59 To ensure all aspects of the qualitative research was reported, the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) 60 was used as a checklist (see Additional file 2).…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies for a faith-based physical activity program

Haughton

Takemoto

Schneider

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Community engagement is critical to the acceleration of evidence-based interventions into community settings. Harnessing the knowledge and opinions of community leaders increases the likelihood of successful implementation, scale up, and sustainment of evidence-based interventions. Faith in Action (Fe en Acción) is an evidence-based promotora-led physical activity program designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among churchgoing Latina women.Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) at various Catholic and Protestant churches with large Latino membership in San Diego County, California to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of Faith in Action and identify promising implementation strategies for program scale-up and dissemination. We interviewed 22 pastors and church staff and analyzed transcripts using an iterative-deductive team approach. Results: Pastors and church staff described barriers and facilitators to implementation within three domains of CFIR: characteristics of individuals (lack of self-efficacy for and knowledge of physical activity; influence on churchgoers’ behaviors), inner setting (church culture and norms, alignment with mission and values, competing priorities, lack of resources), and outer setting (need for buy-in from senior leadership). From the interviews, we identified four promising implementation strategies for the scale-up of faith-based health promotion programs: 1) health behavior change training for pastors and staff; 2) tailored messaging; 3) developing community collaborations; and 4) gaining denominational support.Conclusions: While churches can serve as valuable partners in health promotion, specific barriers and facilitators to implementation must be recognized and understood. Addressing these barriers through targeted implementation strategies at the adopter and organizational level can facilitate improved program implementation and lead the way for scale-up and dissemination.

show abstract

“…The Spanish language focus groups will be transcribed in Spanish and then translated into English using best practices to assure accuracy in translation (Clark, Birkhead, Fernandez, & Egger, ). Briefly, a native Spanish‐speaking moderator and the translator will review all original and translated transcripts.…”

Section: Qualitative Data Management Analysis and Interpretationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Research Consortium focus group Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities, and Experiences of Bladder health

Low

Williams

Hebert‐Beirne

et al. 2019

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim The study purpose is to explore adolescent and adult women's experiences, perceptions, beliefs, knowledge and behaviours related to bladder health across the life course using a socioecological perspective. Lower urinary tract symptoms affect between 20–40% of young adult to middle‐aged women, with symptoms increasing in incidence and severity with aging. There is limited evidence to address bladder health promotion and prevention of dysfunction. This first study of the Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium is designed to address gaps in existing qualitative research in this area. Design This focus group study will be implemented across seven geographically diverse United States research centres using a semi‐structured focus group guide informed by a conceptual framework based on the socioecological model. Methods The study was approved in July 2017. A total of 44 focus groups composed of 6–8 participants representing six different age categories (ranging from 11 to over 65 years) will be completed. We aim to recruit participants with diverse demographic and personal characteristics including race, ethnicity, education, socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, physical/health conditions, and urinary symptom experience. Six of the focus groups will be conducted in Spanish and translated into English. Focus group transcripts will undergo content analysis and data interpretation to identify and classify themes and articulate emerging themes. Discussion This foundational qualitative study seeks to develop an evidence base to inform future research on bladder health promotion in adolescent and adult women. Impact This study has the potential to provide new insights and understanding into adolescent and adult women's lived experience of bladder health, the experience of lower urinary symptoms and knowledge and beliefs across the life course.

show abstract

A Transcription and Translation Protocol for Sensitive Cross-Cultural Team Research

Cited by 68 publications

References 38 publications

Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Identifying barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies for a faith-based physical activity program

Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Research Consortium focus group Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities, and Experiences of Bladder health

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About