2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2003.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
205
3
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
205
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Lacity and Willcocks (1995) and Loebbecke and Huyskens (2006) could not find support for the role of asset specificity in the outsourcing decision. Aubert et al (2004) found asset specificity to be positively linked to outsourcing, contradicting the prediction from TCT. Assessing TCT-based studies explaining IT outsourcing decisions, Karimi-Alaghehband et al (2011) found support for the role of asset specificity in only 40% of 23 studies.…”
Section: Transaction Costsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Similarly, Lacity and Willcocks (1995) and Loebbecke and Huyskens (2006) could not find support for the role of asset specificity in the outsourcing decision. Aubert et al (2004) found asset specificity to be positively linked to outsourcing, contradicting the prediction from TCT. Assessing TCT-based studies explaining IT outsourcing decisions, Karimi-Alaghehband et al (2011) found support for the role of asset specificity in only 40% of 23 studies.…”
Section: Transaction Costsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…For ITO, the results for technical specificity are inconsistent (a significantly negative influence two of five times (40%) Wholey et al, 2001) and a significantly positive influence one of five times (20%) (Aubert et al, 2004). For CC, six of the ten studies (60%) are consistent and report a significant, negative influence (e.g., Watjatrakul, 2005).…”
Section: Asset Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Findings from different studies appear to contradict each other. Studies grounded in incomplete contract theories emphasize that higher level of environmental uncertainty increases the cost of writing a complete contract and leads to transaction costs (Aubert et al 2004;Loh 1994;Poppo and Zenger 1998). In case when firm-specific investments have to be made, these theories suggest not outsourcing.…”
Section: Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research has not been able to provide consistent evidence regarding the effect of environmental uncertainty on firms' sourcing choices, with some studies finding positive association between uncertainty and outsourcing (Ang and Cummings 1997;McLellan et al 1995;Poppo and Zenger 1998), some finding negative association (Aubert et al 2004), and others no significant association at all (Loh 1994). Macher and Richman (2007) and Rindfleisch and Heide (1997) propose that uncertainty of different types drives firm boundary decisions in different directions.…”
Section: Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%