2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Trade-off between the Fitness Cost of Functional Integrases and Long-term Stability of Integrons

Abstract: Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) plays a major role in bacterial microevolution as evident from the rapid emergence and spread of antimicrobial drug resistance. Few studies have however addressed the population dynamics of newly imported genetic elements after HGT. Here, we show that newly acquired class-1 integrons from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Acinetobacter baumannii, free of associated transposable elements, strongly reduce host fitness in Acinetobacter baylyi. Insertional inactivation of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that reshuffling of cassettes within an integron can confer a selective advantage to a functional integrase that comes about through changes in gene expression that are often strong enough to outweigh substantial fitness costs of the integrase. Our model, albeit focusing on a single population, reproduces several empirical observations seen across bacterial strains and species, including a relatively high prevalence of mutationally inactivated integrases in both clinical isolates and experimentally evolved strains (Gillings et al, 2005;Nemergut et al, 2008;Starikova et al, 2012) and cassette arrays that are highly variable in terms of cassette composition and order (reviewed in Gillings, 2014). Taken together, our results support the view that integron integrases are selectively maintained because they enable their hosts to efficiently use cassette arrays as a 'reservoir of standing genetic variability' (Cambray et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results indicate that reshuffling of cassettes within an integron can confer a selective advantage to a functional integrase that comes about through changes in gene expression that are often strong enough to outweigh substantial fitness costs of the integrase. Our model, albeit focusing on a single population, reproduces several empirical observations seen across bacterial strains and species, including a relatively high prevalence of mutationally inactivated integrases in both clinical isolates and experimentally evolved strains (Gillings et al, 2005;Nemergut et al, 2008;Starikova et al, 2012) and cassette arrays that are highly variable in terms of cassette composition and order (reviewed in Gillings, 2014). Taken together, our results support the view that integron integrases are selectively maintained because they enable their hosts to efficiently use cassette arrays as a 'reservoir of standing genetic variability' (Cambray et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…To gain more knowledge on the basic processes controlling the frequencies of antibiotic resistance in bacterial populations, it is essential that we better understand the population dynamics and evolution of bacteria with acquired MGEs encoding antibiotic resistance in both the presence and absence of antibiotic selective pressures (Johnsen et al, 2009). With the exception of work focusing on plasmids (Bouma and Lenski, 1988;Dahlberg and Chao, 2003;San Millan et al, 2014;Gullberg et al, 2014), surprisingly few studies have addressed the impact of MGE acquisitions on bacterial population dynamics (but see Starikova et al, 2012;Starikova et al, 2013). One class of MGEs with a prominent role in the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance determinants where studies on the population dynamics following acquisition are particularly limited are the mobile resistance integrons, and especially the class 1 integrons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Com+ DNA group displayed a bi-modal distribution and was only significantly lower than the Com − group treatment at the 50th percentile, but not at the 75th percentile (P = 0.008 and P = 0.09, respectively; Figure 1c). To verify that the differences observed between Com+ and Com − populations relative to the respective ancestors reflected higher fitness, competitions between fitness representative (Starikova et al, 2012) evolved populations were performed. As expected, evolved Com+ populations outcompeted evolved Com − populations during the first 24 h of the competitions and this advantage was offset favoring the Com − populations between 24 and 90 h (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection rate constants (r) were estimated for the entire 90-h passage as described in (Travisano and Lenski, 1996) with the modification of using 'per passage' as denominator instead of 'per day'. Standard Darwinian relative fitness (w) measurements (Lenski et al, 1991) were estimated during the first 24 h of competitions as described in Starikova et al (2012), except for the incubation at 37°C and shaking at 120 rounds per minute. To quantify the potential differences in stationary and death phase between competing clones and/or populations we measured the difference in survival (su).…”
Section: Serial Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%