2014
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asu059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tractable and interpretable four-parameter family of unimodal distributions on the circle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…f0;2 test when f 0 is posited to be f VMκ (von Mises with any valid value of κ), f C0.45 or f WC0.5 and the φ * (n);μ (n) 2 test (φ * (n);µ 2 with µ estimated from the data), calculated using 1000 samples of size n simulated from the k -sine-skewed distribution with the specified base density g 0 and values of λ and k . Table D.18: Rejection rates, for a nominal significance level of α = 0.05, of the b * 2 based andb 2 based tests calculated using 1000 samples of size n simulated from: the Kato and Jones (2010) distribution with parameters µ = 0, r = 0.5 and the values of ν and κ specified (KJ 10 ); the three-parameter asymmetric submodel given in the Equation (7) of Kato and Jones (2015) with parameters µ = 0, r = 0.5 and the values of γ andβ 2 = νγ(1 − γ) specified (KJ 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f0;2 test when f 0 is posited to be f VMκ (von Mises with any valid value of κ), f C0.45 or f WC0.5 and the φ * (n);μ (n) 2 test (φ * (n);µ 2 with µ estimated from the data), calculated using 1000 samples of size n simulated from the k -sine-skewed distribution with the specified base density g 0 and values of λ and k . Table D.18: Rejection rates, for a nominal significance level of α = 0.05, of the b * 2 based andb 2 based tests calculated using 1000 samples of size n simulated from: the Kato and Jones (2010) distribution with parameters µ = 0, r = 0.5 and the values of ν and κ specified (KJ 10 ); the three-parameter asymmetric submodel given in the Equation (7) of Kato and Jones (2015) with parameters µ = 0, r = 0.5 and the values of γ andβ 2 = νγ(1 − γ) specified (KJ 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The von Mises maximum likelihood estimator of β is therefore robust to a mis‐specification of the error distribution. This discussion does not apply to random effects with an asymmetric distribution, such as the family of Kato & Jones () or the sine skewed von Mises distribution of Abe & Pewsey (). The sampling properties of trueβ^ in models with asymmetric random effects are studied in Section 5, using Monte Carlo methods.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional simulations with a i and e ij having either a Kato–Jones distribution (Kato & Jones, ) or a von Mises distribution, were carried out to investigate the impact of mis‐specified random effects on the inference for β (see Table S2 of the Supplementary Material). The Kato–Jones family was selected because it can be asymmetric, with tails heavier than the von Mises as it generalizes the wrapped Cauchy distribution.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently various alternatives to these classical parametric models, exhibiting asymmetry and multimodality, have been investigated with respect to their mathematical properties and goodness of fit to some real data; see Abe and Pewsey [5], Jones and Pewsey [6], Kato and Jones [7], Kato and Jones [8], Minh and Farnum [9], and Shimizu and Lida [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%