A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to engage in a systematic analysis of academic research that relies on the collection and use of Twitter data, creating topology of Twitter research that details the disciplines and methods of analysis, amount of tweets and users under analysis, the methods used to collect Twitter data, and accounts of ethical considerations related to these projects. Design/methodology/approach – Content analysis of 382 academic publications from 2006 to 2012 that used Twitter as their primary platform for data collection and analysis. Findings – The analysis of over 380 scholarly publications utilizing Twitter data reveals noteworthy trends related to the growth of Twitter-based research overall, the disciplines engaged in such research, the methods of acquiring Twitter data for analysis, and emerging ethical considerations of such research. Research limitations/implications – The findings provide a benchmark analysis that must be updated with the continued growth of Twitter-based research. Originality/value – The research is the first full-text systematic analysis of Twitter-based research projects, focussing on the growth in discipline and methods as well as its ethical implications. It is of value for the broader research community currently engaged in social media-based research, and will prompt reflexive evaluation of what research is occurring, how it is occurring, what is being done with Twitter data, and how researchers are addressing the ethics of Twitter-based research.

Adopting incentive mechanisms for large-scale participation in mobile crowdsensing: from literature review to a conceptual framework

“…Similarly, gamification has entertaining and strong influences on people and one can hardly justify the appropriateness or rationality in engaging citizens with games while flood disasters unfold, with risk of harm to people's property and loved ones. Nonetheless, when the social perspective is taken into consideration, a unique opportunity emerges-the citizens of Jakarta have strong social values as reflected in their engagement with social networks and are rated the "biggest tweeting" city in the world [120]. Many Jakarta citizens already share values in (safely) exchanging real-time flood information using social media.…”

Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images

“…Developments in digital methods have provided researchers with approaches and tools with which to study social media sociologically (Baym, 2013;Bennett & Segerberg, 2012;Burgess & Bruns, 2012;Gerrard, 2018;Halfpenny & Procter, 2015;Kennedy, Moss, Birchall, & Moshonas, 2015;Lupton, 2014;Marres, 2017;Rieder, 2013Rieder, , 2015aRieder, , 2015bRoberts, Snee, Hine, Morey, & Watson, 2016;Zimmer & Proferes, 2014). These digital methods have in some ways benefitted from the 'platformisation' of the web, in which web applications, including social media, are increasingly integrated with each other and the wider web, facilitating increased flows of data and information (Helmond, 2015).…”

Towards Internet Scale Quality-of-Experience Measurement with Twitter

“…The public Twitter Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) offer programmatic access to public tweets in a well-documented JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) format. Twitter is the most widespread service of its kind and, due to its openness and popularity, current subject of research in several disciplines covering a broad range of examined topics [34]. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of using tweets as an indicator for QoE drops.…”