2019
DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2019.1670786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A top-down method for the derivation of metrics for the assessment of design automation potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method chosen to evaluate the DHAM in industrial design scenarios and with expert designers is a series of workshops with three engineering companies. This evaluation method and results reporting is based specifically on the work of Hamraz & Clarkson (2015), but workshops as a method for evaluation of design methods in industry are commonly reported (Laverne et al 2015;Kumke et al 2017;Rigger et al 2019;Dordlofva & Törlind 2020;Prabhu et al 2020a). This evaluation method is chosen because it focusses on evaluation of the method and not of the individual results generated by each company.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method chosen to evaluate the DHAM in industrial design scenarios and with expert designers is a series of workshops with three engineering companies. This evaluation method and results reporting is based specifically on the work of Hamraz & Clarkson (2015), but workshops as a method for evaluation of design methods in industry are commonly reported (Laverne et al 2015;Kumke et al 2017;Rigger et al 2019;Dordlofva & Törlind 2020;Prabhu et al 2020a). This evaluation method is chosen because it focusses on evaluation of the method and not of the individual results generated by each company.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If both subgroups are working on the same product or concept, each subgroup freely brainstorms for 45 minutes. Then, the ideas generated by one subgroup, in the form of annotated sketches, are passed to the other and each subgroup uses the other subgroup’s ideas as the basis for a Brainwriting 6-3-5 session (Rhorbach 1969), adjusted to the number of ideas and participants. This second portion of the ideation session lasts no more than 15 minutes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…redundant data generation that causes time to maintain and synchronize. This allows to derive related metrics [29] that can be used to validate the initially defined goal. In addition, the identified sources of waste permit to narrow down the amount of relevant data that needs to be investigated, e.g.…”
Section: Value Stream Mapping/dpfmeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 70% of the product costs are determined during the design stage, making it crucial to come to informed decisions at this stage of product development [2,9,10]. In this respect, the use of computational methods and tools has shown to be an enabler to increase design performance [14] regarding efficiency and effectiveness of product development [29,33]. Nevertheless, state of practice still does not reflect the opportunities computational methods provide in the early stages of engineering design [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the engineering domain is characterized by domain specific tools featuring support for highly specific tasks, e.g. CAx [30] or design automation [31], [32]. Still, the works presented in [33], [34] have shown that the principles of enterprise architecture are also applicable in a PLM context.…”
Section: Enterprise Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%