2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A toolkit for the quantitative evaluation of chronic wounds evolution for early detection of non-healing wounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although larger wounds were expected to be related to delayed healing, 38,41,60‐67 our results obtained the opposite, that is, larger wounds were related to reduced risk of delay. This association can be explained by the fact that, in larger wounds, the effect of treatment on healing is more noticeable than in smaller wounds.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although larger wounds were expected to be related to delayed healing, 38,41,60‐67 our results obtained the opposite, that is, larger wounds were related to reduced risk of delay. This association can be explained by the fact that, in larger wounds, the effect of treatment on healing is more noticeable than in smaller wounds.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Several authors refer that the time of existence of the upper wound (from 3 to 6 months) is a prognostic factor for delayed healing. [59][60][61][62] Although larger wounds were expected to be related to delayed healing, 38,41,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] our results obtained the opposite, that is, larger wounds were related to reduced risk of delay. This association can be explained by the fact that, in larger wounds, the effect of treatment on healing is more noticeable than in smaller wounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%