2013
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26928g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A toolbox of differently sized and labeled PMMA nanoparticles for cellular uptake investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanoparticles were formed via nanoprecipitation to circumvent the use of surfactants and to obtain narrow size distribution. [28][29][30] Previous results gathered…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nanoparticles were formed via nanoprecipitation to circumvent the use of surfactants and to obtain narrow size distribution. [28][29][30] Previous results gathered…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The benefit of these polymers for preparation of defined nanoparticles via nanoprecipitation was already demonstrated earlier. [28,40,41] An advantage of nanoprecipitation is the absence of surfactants, as they can influence the properties of nanoparticles and their biological impact. [42,43] Furthermore, nanoparticles with different diameters with narrow size distributions can easily be obtained.…”
Section: Polymer and Nanoparticle Preparation And Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only subtle difference was that the cellular uptake of sLDH NPs was seen to be complete in the first 2 h, while L-LDH NPs showed a steady and continual uptake over up to 8 h. Thus, this work shows that the rate of cellular uptake in terms of the particle number was comparable for the 54 nm (sLDH) and 90 nm (L-LDH) NPs. It is reported that internalisation of NPs less than 200 nm involves the clathrin-mediated endocytotic pathway [17,18,66,67]; thus sLDH-FITC ($54 nm) and L-LDH-FITC ($90 nm) used in this work entered HCT-116 cells through the same pathway. That would be the reason why sLDH-FITC and L-LDH-FITC resulted in similar uptake regardless of the particle size difference.…”
Section: Effect Of Ldh-np Size On Cellular Delivery Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Particle size is an important determinant for internalization by macropinocytosis, as demonstrated by Vollrath and coworkers, who used using nanoparticles based on poly-(methyl methacrylate) in Hela cells. These authors found that CME is the predominant pathway for internalization of smaller nanoparticles (<200 nm), whereas macropinocytosis is the main pathway for internalization of larger particles (>300 nm) (Vollrath et al 2012). Nevertheless, small particles can also be internalized by macropinocytosis.…”
Section: Macropinocytosismentioning
confidence: 97%