A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability

Abstract

Abstract:In Sweden and in other countries, building owners are encouraged to help reduce energy consumption, both in order to contribute to national energy saving goals and, in terms of their own interests, to reduce the costs of heating and operation of the building. However, it is important to pursue the most optimal strategy available so as to achieve cost-effective energy usage while simultaneously maintaining excellent indoor environments, without sacrificing the architectural quality or negatively affecting the environment. Building managers often do not have the time or expertise required to make a proper evaluation of the available options before making a final decision. Renovation measures are often considered in the light of repaying investments in a short time rather than taking into account life cycle costs, despite the fact that a thoughtful, comprehensive renovation is often more cost-effective in the long run. This article presents a systematic approach for evaluating different renovation alternatives based on sustainability criteria. A methodology has been developed to evaluate different renovation alternatives from environmental, economic, and social perspectives. The benefit of using the proposed methodology is that building managers who face a major renovation work are provided with a clear comparison between the different renovation options, viewed from a sustainability perspective, this may facilitate, in the long run, a culture in which renovation measures which involve marginally increased costs, but are seen to lead to significant environmental and social benefits, will be considered and carried out. OPEN ACCESSSustainability 2014, 6 4228

From Tool-Making to Tool-Using – And Back: Rationales for Adoption and Use of LCC

“…Gluch (2014) noted that the models often were multi-dimensional to capture the complexities of these types of decisions (e.g. Wang, Zmeu-reanu, & Rivard, 2005;Ding, 2008;Sharma et al, 2011;Swarr et al, 2011, Brown et al, 2013Mjörnell et al, 2014), thereby reflecting an 'objectively determined' functionalist view towards application, similarly to what Rex and Baumann (2008) noted for the development and application of another life cycle tool, environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). The LCC models, calculation methods and/ or tools designed by researchers were then often tested in one or more real cases (e.g.…”

“…Sustainable renovation is seen as a key for meeting goals related to, for example, decarbonization (Mjörnell, Boss, Lindahl, & Molnar, 2014) and reduced total energy consumption of buildings (Ástmarsson, Jensen, & Maslesa, 2013). Renovation is currently also a major challenge for Swedish real estate and property owners since there is great need to transform an aging, energyinefficient and unsustainable building stock in an economically feasible way (Thuvander, Femenias, Mjörnell, & Meiling, 2012;Palm & Reindl, 2016).…”

Costs and Benefits in the Recovery of Historic Buildings: The Application of an Economic Model

“…As widely recognized in the current literature [12][13][14][15][16] the general model requires further specifications if it refers to historical buildings. In this sense, a protocol is structured following the steps in Figure 1.…”

Sustainable Renovation Strategy in the Swedish Million Homes Programme: A Case Study

“…Renovation and sustainability have been studied from a number of different perspectives. Several authors have developed general tools and models that can be used to evaluate renovation policies from a sustainability perspective [10][11][12][13][14]. Renovation issues can also be discussed from a broader philosophical perspective and in relation to theories of justice, as is done in [15,16].…”