2014
DOI: 10.1111/age.12212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tool for tracking genetic contributions of wild Penaeus (Melicertus) plebejus broodstock to hatchery populations

Abstract: Stock enhancement, restocking and sea ranching are being increasingly applied in both fisheries and conservation. The contribution of hatchery stock to fishery harvest and the maintenance of the genetic structure of stocked populations are both important considerations when releasing captive-bred organisms into natural systems. Use of wild-caught broodstock generally overcomes some of the genetic problems associated with domesticated hatchery populations, but there is still a need to ensure that a sufficient p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the small size at release and moulting of crustaceans, it is not possible to use physical tags to determine recapture rates of stocked prawns. Non‐invasive, genetic markers provide a potential mark to distinguish stocked from wild individuals (Bravington & Ward, ) and have been developed to some extent for Penaeus ( Marsupenaeus ) japonicus (Spence Bate) , Penaeus esculentus Haswell and Penaeus ( Melicertus ) plebejus (Hess) (Chan, Sherwin, & Taylor, ; Jerry et al., ; Liu & Cordes, ; Loneragan et al., ). However, a greater number of markers would be needed for M. dalli than the above three Penaeus species, as the current culture practice for M. dalli involves collecting wild broodstock (Tweedley et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the small size at release and moulting of crustaceans, it is not possible to use physical tags to determine recapture rates of stocked prawns. Non‐invasive, genetic markers provide a potential mark to distinguish stocked from wild individuals (Bravington & Ward, ) and have been developed to some extent for Penaeus ( Marsupenaeus ) japonicus (Spence Bate) , Penaeus esculentus Haswell and Penaeus ( Melicertus ) plebejus (Hess) (Chan, Sherwin, & Taylor, ; Jerry et al., ; Liu & Cordes, ; Loneragan et al., ). However, a greater number of markers would be needed for M. dalli than the above three Penaeus species, as the current culture practice for M. dalli involves collecting wild broodstock (Tweedley et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrity of extracted DNA was tested using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR amplification of mtDNA control region (mtCR) was achieved using a published primer pair ( Chan et al, 2014 ). PCR assays were conducted in 30 µL reaction volumes containing, 0.2 µM of each primer (forward 5′-ATTAGCACTAGGTACTGAGA-3′and reverse 5′-AGT​TTC​AGG​ATA​AGA​AGA​CAC​TAT-3′) in 2 μL, 15 µL of 2 × PCR Master Mix, 11 µL of RNase free water, and 2 µL of the DNA template.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%