2017
DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2017.1323669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tolerance Interval Approach to Assessing the Biosimilarity of Follow-On Biologics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various statistical tests to assess biosimilarity have been proposed (Chen et al, 2017;Shin and Kang, 2016;Lu et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2012;Kang and Chow, 2013). Kang and Chow (2013) considered statistical tests based on the ratio estimator and linearization method in a three-arm parallel design to determine biosimilarity between reference drugs and test drugs for continuous endpoints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various statistical tests to assess biosimilarity have been proposed (Chen et al, 2017;Shin and Kang, 2016;Lu et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2012;Kang and Chow, 2013). Kang and Chow (2013) considered statistical tests based on the ratio estimator and linearization method in a three-arm parallel design to determine biosimilarity between reference drugs and test drugs for continuous endpoints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A type I error rate and power are also investigated theoretically and empirically. Chen et al (2017) recently, assessed biosimilarity based on tolerance limits in a two-arm parallel design. The biosimilarity index based on tolerance limits was found to be more stringent and conservative when compared to other moment-based criterion, especially when variance of biosimilar is larger than that of reference drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some literatures published in recent years to deal with the development of statistical methodology for evaluation of "biosimilarity" between biosimilar products and innovator's biologics [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. As indicated by Chow et al [7], current regulation for assessment of bioequivalence may be too loose to be applied for assessment of biosimilarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%