2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tissue Graft Model of DNA Damage Response in the Normal and Malignant Human Prostate

Abstract: Purpose DNA damage responses are relevant to prostate cancer initiation, progression and treatment. Few models of the normal and malignant human prostate that maintain stromal-epithelial interactions in vivo exist in which to study DNA damage responses. We evaluated the feasibility of maintaining tissue slice grafts at subcutaneous vs subrenal capsular sites in RAG2−/− γC−/− mice to study the DNA damage responses of normal and malignant glands. Materials and Methods We compared the take rate and histology of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we selected tumor cell lines due to the ease of calculating SF in proliferating cells. Therefore, our results may not necessarily apply to peripheral blood lymphocytes or normal human cells, although there appear no data suggesting quite different patterns in DSB repair between normal cells and tumor cells [ 18 , 39 , 47 ]. Ideally, similar experiments should also be performed in peripheral blood lymphocytes and normal human cells to assess the adverse effects of CT examinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, we selected tumor cell lines due to the ease of calculating SF in proliferating cells. Therefore, our results may not necessarily apply to peripheral blood lymphocytes or normal human cells, although there appear no data suggesting quite different patterns in DSB repair between normal cells and tumor cells [ 18 , 39 , 47 ]. Ideally, similar experiments should also be performed in peripheral blood lymphocytes and normal human cells to assess the adverse effects of CT examinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…also, it should be safe and not be a stimulator of immune system In addition, it must helploads entering into cells and escaping lysosomal degradation (36,(127)(128)(129)(130). According to what had been discussed, it can be drawn a conclusion that after DNA damage occurrence (naturally or by chemotheraputic agents), two distinct pathways lie ahead of cell fate, DNA damage repair or apoptosis (131) (Fig.1)…”
Section: -Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%