2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time-lapse evaluation of conventional slow freezing and vitrification of PN-stage embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2, 18] Besides, the conventional slow freezing approach requires a commercially available programmable freezer or a cryogenic refrigerator with a lengthy (up to hours) cooling process, [16, 20] and after cooling, the samples must be transferred into liquid nitrogen (LN 2 ) for long-term storage. [21] These factors make it uneconomic, time-consuming, and complicated. [5] Vitreous cryopreservation as an emerging strategy, is regarded to be safer and more reliable for cell preservation when compared with the conventional slowing freezing method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2, 18] Besides, the conventional slow freezing approach requires a commercially available programmable freezer or a cryogenic refrigerator with a lengthy (up to hours) cooling process, [16, 20] and after cooling, the samples must be transferred into liquid nitrogen (LN 2 ) for long-term storage. [21] These factors make it uneconomic, time-consuming, and complicated. [5] Vitreous cryopreservation as an emerging strategy, is regarded to be safer and more reliable for cell preservation when compared with the conventional slowing freezing method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%