2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time–frequency based electromyographic analysis technique for use in cerebral palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of multivariate statistical methods have been developed for dealing with the complexity and interdependence of gait data [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. While some of these methods focus primarily on identifying gait patterns and relationships among variables, several aim to develop either joint-specific or overall indexes of gait pathology [7,8,10,[12][13][14]19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of multivariate statistical methods have been developed for dealing with the complexity and interdependence of gait data [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. While some of these methods focus primarily on identifying gait patterns and relationships among variables, several aim to develop either joint-specific or overall indexes of gait pathology [7,8,10,[12][13][14]19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, instead of the commonly used frequency transform of sEMG, we resorted to time-scale representation [12,26,27,35,36]. Although it has already been applied to various electrophysiological signals for diagnosis of different pathologies, such as Parkinson's disease [5], cerebral palsy [21] and lower back pain [28], it has never been combined with the entropy measures to investigate the amplitude distributions at different dyadic scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this method to investigate dynamic muscle dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy has lead to clear distinctions between this population and the normally developing group (Wakeling et al 2007). Lauer et al (2007) expanded on this and were able to show differences in levels of cocontraction between the less and more involved side.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%